senate. we know the midterm election haven t incumbent president swing in the opposite direction. democrats will not win them back simply by being against president trump. we need to be for our economic policies, better deal and his raw deal will become clear to the american public. chris: in more than one third of house races, republicans running for those seats have run ads that go after nancy pelosi. here s an example from the recent special election in pennsylvania. conor lamb is a pelosi liberal. his values aren t our values. chris: conor lamb won. one of the ways in which he won was he promised not to support nancy pelosi is nancy pelosi a liability for democrats in this
same. juan: it s the same. what about mitch mcconnell. dana perino does mitch mcconnell have a higher or lower rating than nancy pelosi? dana: really, the democrats do run ads against paul ryan. but, don t put it past her to do something very interesting, i think it s possible. i m not making a prediction. i m saying it is possible and i think she would be willing to do it. come july, if it looks like she is really a big weight around the democrats ankles and they can t finish the race with her. i think i would not be surprised if she made an announcement around july 4th resays she said if we win, i will not run for speaker again. and then basically clear the way for them. jesse: stay in there, nancy. kimberly: hang in there. juan: we want mitch mcconnell stay in there come on, mitch. kimberly: did you go cheerleaders on the five. fastest seven coming your way next. stay with us.
weekly, by the minute. they have no idea who is running these ads. we focused on russia. but others could have run ads. i m not making the allegations. for all we know, venezuela did. they just don t know. and i know they have said confidently, well, this many ads were run. let me tell you, they don t know. they re not geared up to know. the speculation is they can know whatever they want to know. it s up to you guys to put the pressure on them to make them know. and i don t want to see government get too heavily involved in regulating social media. but at the same time, their power scares me. they need to step up to the plate and discuss some reasonable alternatives. they can do the same thing we have to do in every other media outlet in terms of reporting political donations. they can start there. another thing that is a matter of principal. what s going on with roy moore.
intolerable and say this is too much for us? the moral floor to he me starts with the truth. if mr. moore said, okay, i heard the allegations and, yeah, i did it but too bad. the statute of limitations has run. and i m not going to apologize for it. that could be different? that would be different. understood. and he is entitled to due process. so are his alleged victims. and i can promise you if mr. moore is elected that due process will be afforded to both sides because somebody is going to file an ethics complaint. right. you can take that to the bank. we ll see what happens with that. but it has created an interesting question of leadership in that campaign and how people responded to it. let me ask you one other thing while i have you. taxes. it looks like you guys are going to get it done.
trust us. we don t need it. it s in our self-interest to make this better. that hasn t worked. even in terms of what s going on this week, we re going to release the ads that affected our election one way or another to congress and they can release them to the public. they are falling on some legal lees. if the law didn t awe loi those to be out, there s something wrong. she was making the argument about accepting payment. i turn to the banking industry where there are strict rules around know your client. only interface with countries where you respect and understand the rule of law. some people just pay us in rubles. that doesn t really fly. that goes to the heart of the matter. facebook created a giant platform. anyone can jump on and run ads. they can t keep track of it. they have to figure out how to