could reshape murmur kansas city. in all three high profile games, they were split 63. for the highlighting the sharp ideological divide between the nine justices currently on the bench. yesterday, the court ruled in favor of lloyd smith, a wild designer from colorado who refused to work on projects related to same sex marriage, even though it is unclear if she was ever asked to do so in the first place. but, she sued on hypothetical grounds claiming that it would violate her first amendment right free speech rights and the courts six conservative members agreed. it is a major blow to members of the lgbtq community. and in her dissent, justice sonia sotomayor called the ruling quote, profoundly wrong, she explained further that quote, the act of discrimination has never constituted expression under the first amendment, also yesterday, the court struck down president biden s plan to forgive student loans for millions of americans, the court s conservative majority ruled that t
dueling decisions, creating a flash point in the fight for abortion rights in texas. a federal judge s halting the fda is more than two decades old approval of the drug medford pretzels own one of the main medications used to provide abortions. but less than an hour later, conflicting court ruling out of washington state judge their order the federal government to protect access to the drug and 17 democratic led states and the district of columbia. the two decisions are the most significant on abortion since the u. s. supreme court overturned roe v. wade last summer, cnn s rosa flores and arlette signs are following all of the developments rosa to you first. why did the texas judge suspend the fda approval of this drug take us through the judge s order? it will. fred this judge did not hold back in this order . 67 pages 67 pages, he rips apart the fda approval of oppressed own, saying that the approval was flawed that the fda did not consider the risks to girls and women. let
. rachel: good morning, everyone. it is 6:00 a.m. i love starting the morning with the sar spangled banner. did you see the dogs? will: good morning. todd: goo morning. rachel: very patriotic. i looked at my wardrobe. i will be america today. i did it. i did it. by the way love seeing dogs watching the three of us on the couch with dann bongino. that was awesome. will: did you have a great birthday yesterday? rachel: i did. i had a movie marathon with the kids. something i never do. usually get home from work i look at all the stuff they didn t clean up when i was at work and i ended up cleaning. i watched the prince of egypt because my kids are studying about egypt. it is a cartoon about the story of moses. we watched another cartoon, animated film, joseph of the coat of many colors. todd: wholesome clean and wholesome and some nc-17 movie. will: my wife i put something on to watch, i escape and relax, it is inevitably violent. rachel: same with my boys. they like that. s
could reshape murmur kansas city. in all three high profile games, they were split 63. for the highlighting the sharp ideological divide between the nine justices currently on the bench. yesterday, the court ruled in favor of lloyd smith, a wild designer from colorado who refused to work on projects related to same sex marriage, even though it is unclear if she was ever asked to do so in the first place. but, she sued on hypothetical grounds claiming that it would violate her first amendment right free speech rights and the courts six conservative members agreed. it is a major blow to members of the lgbtq community. and in her dissent, justice sonia sotomayor called the ruling quote, profoundly wrong, she explained further that quote, the act of discrimination has never constituted expression under the first amendment, also yesterday, the court struck down president biden s plan to
that this drug is safe. some of those organizations include the american medical association, the president of that organization, issuing a statement saying, in part, this ruling quote, flies in the face of science and evidence and threatens to upend access to a safe and effective drug. the statement goes on to say the courts disregard for well established scientific facts in favor of speculative allegations and ideological assertions will cause harm to our patients and undermines the health of the nation now, fred one of the things that s clear from this order is that this judge also did not consider some of the arguments from the fda, which included what these legal what these medical experts are saying . and that is that this drug was approved by the fda back in 2000 that has been used by about five million women. and that this drug is safe. fred and then rosa . what do we know about this judge? and during the preliminary injunction hearings