one easily could have done the exact opposite plot it could have been hispanic family who sends tiny tim out to get a thanksgiving turkey and shot by ms-13. beware of emotional argument. . that s what this episode was. griff: forget the fact that we are still wondering spatchcock means. the point of holiday challenging silent norms. is it your sense that hollywood jumped the shark in terms of addressing reality because the rule of law isn t something that she brings into her episode. neither is the fact that the administration has changed the family separation policy. use the word reality. right? it s holiday way off base. also most of the media. i remember this story and you might, too. i think back in august of a couple, husband and wife who were rushing to the hospital because she was going to give birth and they were pulled over by ice agents and he was deported back to mexico.
paul: ronald reagan appointee justice anthony kennedy was at the center of many court s biggest decisions over the last 3 decades casting the key vote in landmark cases involving abortion, affirmative action, gay rights and guns and campaign finance. editor-in-chief of the cato and i spoke with him about the kennedy legacy. welcome. let s talk about justice kennedy and legacy, you wrote this week while you end up agreeing where justice came out on a lot of cases, you disagree with the way he got there, explain that. part of the rule of law isn t just getting the right results but the reasoning matter, that s why the supreme court explained itself, so people can follow how the law develops, what it means, what the constitution means and justice kennedy didn t follow kind of conventional juris
paul: ronald reagan appointee justice anthony kennedy was at the center of many court s biggest decisions over the last 3 decades casting the key vote in landmark cases involving abortion, affirmative action, gay rights and guns and campaign finance. editor-in-chief of the cato and i spoke with him about the kennedy legacy. welcome. let s talk about justice kennedy and legacy, you wrote this week while you end up agreeing where justice came out on a lot of cases, you disagree with the way he got there, explain that. part of the rule of law isn t just getting the right results but the reasoning matter, that s why the supreme court explained itself, so people can follow how the law develops, what it means, what the constitution means and justice kennedy didn t follow
the judiciary so what does it matter there was so serious you know it was another serious wallop sort of i just put it in context i was talking to the judiciary in that context and yes absolutely anywhere in the world if the rule of law isn t covered and then there s a problem and we pride ourselves in doing this. nobody is above the law wouldn t have given warning would why do you see spoke specifically about rule of delinquents no danger of the rule of delinquents here. the more it is the law states clearly that no there s nobody above the law nobody prime minister downwards and there have been allegations against people in parliament people going in and cabinet even and they have been taken very seriously why not. you can accuse people better the end of the hague has to be proven in court barely six weeks after this more shocking murder that we ve had this kind of