wait, wait. that would have been completely lawless. don t blame the justice department wait, you just said it was an act of terror. of course. and a crime. and you can still prosecute later, but in the meantime before you offer miranda rights, get some of america s best interrogators in there and you find out what this guy knows. is he connected to a larger cell? are there pending attacks? are there foreign links? where did the training come from? how did you learn to make the bombs? basic simple questions this we need to know because the safety and security of the american people in this case i think are paramount. sean, do you know who gave him his miranda rights? i don t know exactly who but we were told he was. a federal judge, a magistrate judge at a rule 5 hearing in the hospital. we didn t have to do that. that s not a decision the department of justice made. when there s a rule 5 hearing it informs the defendant of
where the judge basically told the defendant what constitutional rights he could expect to have in this case. you heard the judge say that there was a probable cause determination. in colorado, we do an initial probable cause determination to make sure that there s kind of an overview of the evidence so that the court knows that there s enough evidence to continue to hold the defendant. the defendant is being held without bond at this point in time. eventually, there will be a preliminary hearing and proof evident presumption great hearing and we will ask the court the continue holding him without bond. so, are there any questions? do you i was a reporter and i m from cbs and i was part of the media actually in the courtroom, and i was struck by the fact that he seemed to have no emotion, and did not follow what was going on and i don t think that i ever saw his head turn when conversations were being made. is he on a medication or something? or is he aware? can you tel