Provision that kept trillions of dollars in corporate wealth flowing into federal campaigns. I think that is a misleading description of the case. As i read it, the Citizens United case involved a nonprofit organization, not a wealthy forprivate corporation, and the case did not involve Campaign Contributions at all. Am i right . It left standing the contribution sections. We have seen a flood of corporate wealth flooding into campaigns since the Citizens United decision . We have seen a lot of individuals giving money. We have seen an increase in the amount of money from what i call main street rather than wall street. But we have not seen is precisely what was predicted. We have not seen enormous sums, let alone trillions of dollars, from the Biggest Companies in america flowing into the electoral process. That just has not happened. My time is up, mr. Chairman. Senator schumer . I might note there are two roll call votes on the floor. There is an effort to keep the Committee Hearing