they funneled it to the law firm. funneled it through the law firm and the president repaid it. well, giuliani s defense of michael cohen evolved, of course, as talk of cohen turning against the president grew louder. imagine if that came out on october 25th, 2016. cohen did his job. michael cohen i think would tell you he s got nothing incriminating with the president. and really they should stop going after him. they re torturing the guy. i don t see how he has any credibility. this is basically if you had a trial, and there won t be a trial here, but if you had a trial, why would you want to pick? there s nobody that knows him that hasn t warned me that if his back is against the wall he will lie like crazy. because he s lied all his life. rudy the defense of the president also shifted from saying there was no collusion to arguing that collusion isn t a crime. this started as collusion with the russians.
considering rudy giuliani as a lawyer for purposes of defending donald trump or really any other purposes. this is somebody who has done as much to make the case that donald trump could be implicated in crimes as he has to take away from it. he goes and says this isn t campaign money. well, that s not actually good for donald trump s case here. rudy giuliani has, you know, done the job he s been asked to, much like many other trump aides has, go out and say things for the president that are not true, absurd, things that can be disproven immediately and sometimes things that evolve and can be later disproven. we ve seen between the president and giuliani and all the other people who represented the president the story about the hush money payments just change from there were no hush money payments, the president did didn t know about the hush money payments, he didn t know about them until later on, all of a sudden he knows about them beforehand. i mean, it is basically a distraction, a
defendant, anything. and this guy has proven he can outdo any of them. chris, i think we should stop considering rudy giuliani as a lawyer for purposes of defending donald trump or really any other purposes. this is not somebody this is somebody who has done as much to make the case that donald trump could be implicated in crimes as he has to take away from it. he goes and says this isn t you know, this isn t campaign money. well, that s not actual good for donald trump s case here. rudy giuliani has, you know, done the job he s been asked to, much like many other trump aides have, which is to go out and say things for the president that are not true, absurd, things that can be disproven immediately and sometimes things that evolve and can later be disproven. we ve seen between the president and giuliani and all the other people who ve represented the president the story about the hush money payments just change from there were no hush money payments, the president didn t know ab