Right now is scott sanchez, the citys Zoning Administrator and also represents the Planning Commission and Planning Department and will be joined shortly by senior building inspector joseph duffy who will be representing the. The board requests you turn off all phones and pagers so they will not interrupt the proceedings. Please carry on conversations in the hallway. The boards rules of proceedings are as follows each side has 7 minutes to present their cases and 3 minutes for rebuttals. People affiliated with these comments must include their comments within the 7 or 3 minutes. Member members of the public not affiliated with the parties have up to 3 minutes. To assist the board in accurate preparation of minutes are asked but not required to submit a speaker card when you come up to the podium. Speaker cards and pens are available on the left side of the podium. The board welcomes your comments and suggestions. If you have questions about requesting a rehearing, board rules or hearin
27th here at city hall, they will have speakers, and the harvey hills club will have an altar and a band and we will move on to the camera shop, so please come to remember some ofh the important question is will you be bringing me a present . Some shoes, yeah. Okay, and number 7, request for new business and future agenda items . I would like to reiterate that i would like to hear from david chus office, and if thats it, i am calling this to a close. Like to welcome everyone to San Franciscos Planning Commission regular hearing for thursday, november 29th, 2012. Please be aware that the commission does not tolerate any disruption or outbursts of any kind. Please silence any mobile devices that may sound off during the proceedings. If you would like to speak on an agendized item please fill out a smear card. And when speaking before the commission, please state your name for the record. At this time wed like to take roll. Commission president fong . Here. Commission Vice President wu .
The neighborhood that we love, including the nature of the open space and the backyards, the playground across the street. Its a great place, its a great neighborhood to raise children, and were very pleased that kevin and karen are moving in with their two children. I think its great the families are moving in. Our basic unresolved issue with the remodel is the impact it has on our space, air and light and privacy. [speaker not understood] or remodel, we believe the remodel will greatly impact our space, air and light and privacy, especially the Southern Exposure of our house. We are most concerned about the lack of a setback on the main floor. The main floor living space will come right up to our Property Line versus the separation that exists today. The rear part of our house is setback 7 feet from that Property Line and i believe the existing design which i think is from 1911 is setback similar amount of feet, maybe a little more. We are asking that the design take the impact to us
In relation to the midblock open area. The rdt noted the following. That light and air access and the building scale in relation to the midblock open area are addressed by the projects rear addition stepping down toward the rear yard. The rear addition would not extend to an exceptional depth when compared to the depths of both adjacent buildings. With regard to privacy the project is considered to be within the privacy tolerances to be expected when living in a dense urban environment such as San Francisco and within the Zoning District which allows full lot width development and requires no side yards. With regard to neighborhood character and context, the addition would not be visible from the public rightofway. However, the project proposes durable high quality residential scale materials such as painted woodsiding and metal wood windows for both vertical and horizontal elements of the project. In conclusion, the Department Finds the project to be consistent with the residential De
Full lot width development and requires no side yards. With regard to neighborhood character and context, the addition would not be visible from the public rightofway. However, the project proposes durable high quality residential scale materials such as painted woodsiding and metal wood windows for both vertical and horizontal elements of the project. In conclusion, the Department Finds the project to be consistent with the residential Design Guidelines and does not contain or he create any exceptional or extraordinary circumstances ~. The Department Recommends that the commission not take dr and approve the project as revised. That concludes my presentation. Thank you. Dr requestor, your team has five minutes. [speaker not understood], and my wife and i live at 122 18th avenue. Thank you for allowing us to voice our remaining concerns regarding the proposed remodel of 126 18th avenue. My wife and her family have lived in this home for over 35 years. Erin and i have lived there since