getting together and attempting to strike a balance that time, 20 years ago, that s over. we heard not only we heart from the white house eventually- later in the day, they said the constitutional lawyer in the oval office does not approve.cos not surprising, but again putting that emphasis on what hn understands the constitution and how this all works, although, u you know, he s taken a lot of r heat for not necessarily aril adhering to it at all times. it wasn t a constitutional rg ruling, by the way. it was a statutory ruling. his constitutional int interpretation has left a lot te be desired in many instances in this administration. i think the fact he opposes this ruling, you know, it was a ru ruling based on the religious freedom of restoration act says and very practical ruling.very we ve got to leave it thereg panel. thank you very much. see you next week. uppa next, bringing americar heroes to the highest courts in the land. the land.