emotional distress. which is basically saying that they there needs to be some type of content that they intended to cause harry and meghan harm because they knew that they were going after them, taking a lot of photos and because of what happened to harry of his mom that this caused him potential harm. trace: it seems like a fair statement. the uk, i was talking to the uk were reported. his name is neil sean and he had this to say about a potential ulterior motive. the bigger issue really over here is as we know, prince harry is battling for the right for royal protection back in the united kingdom and when might say this kind of plays into their narrative. trace: yeah, so what he is saying is, prince harry is looking for a security detail here in the u.s. and maybe if they build up this big narrative, maybe to get it. and maybe there s some claim there. what do you think? no, i think that is, you know, an interesting argument to see potentially because of that, that is the
well? i how things operate in the us as well? ~ ., well? i think the government, the met olice well? i think the government, the met police have well? i think the government, the met police have been well? i think the government, the met police have been clear - well? i think the government, the met police have been clear on - well? i think the government, the j met police have been clear on this that his security is not the responsibility of the united kingdom. he has chosen with his wife, the duchess to live in america. so does arguable that the actual response ability rests with the americans. so i don t think it is the responsibility in any way now that the metropolitan police or the united kingdom s government should afford protection to harry. my view is of course the best protection he could receive would be that of royal protection but working on a foreign land for an indefinite period just does not work. so yes, he does have a problem in the problem with a private securit
agencies that will give you the best security. that is why government ministers in this country are afforded protection, received the very best protection possible in the world because on what i have just said, we have here a rather shattered protection in my view where they don t have those contacts. they don t have that information. to enable such a journey like this to happen. and i sort of predicted something like this some months ago because unless you deal with it properly, this will happen again. it is you deal with it properly, this will happen again- happen again. it is part of the problem. happen again. it is part of the problem, given happen again. it is part of the problem, given all happen again. it is part of the problem, given all of- happen again. it is part of the problem, given all of his - problem, given all of his difficulties with different sections of the royal family, difficulties with different sections of the royalfamily, potentially here photographers, p
so really just take their phones and have a look at that. let s see if it lasted two hours. really what is more important and one wouldn t waste any negativity on anybody. what i mean by that is any accidents or problem like that, you wouldn t wish that. but the bigger issue over here is as we now know, prince harry s battling for the right for royal protection back here in the united kingdom. this falls on one of their big comeback nights. nobody was interested in the award. the dress got very little traction. and this kind of plays into their narrative. remember, oprah called it their truth. i find it very, very hard to believe as your mayor said that this could have gone on for two hours. where is the proof of that? i think until we see more evidence, we would have to say that once again, we re living in harry and meghan s world and asked to believe something until proven is hard to believe. a great point.
am a republican i support the right of people to have the party and enjoy the day but i believe in the rights of all citizens and those rights of all citizens and those rights were trampled on. next time it could be your rights and you won t like it. speak up for everyone s rights!- won t like it. speak up for everyone s rights! won t like it. speak up for eve one s rithts! ~ . ,, everyone s rights! mick, thank you ve much everyone s rights! mick, thank you very much indeed. everyone s rights! mick, thank you very much indeed. nick everyone s rights! mick, thank you very much indeed. nick wright - everyone s rights! mick, thank you l very much indeed. nick wright there who was down there, campaigning journalist, we had dai davies on the former head of royal protection and a wonderful range of viewers, hugely appreciated. the question this morning, and i will come to the statement of the met after the news and the sport, a simple question, did protest police go too far? i will look