number of professors and scholars and experts and researchers. it is censored. don t talk about it. it is the paper of record, the gold standard, all of the news fit to print. that yet day in and day out it attacked the foundational principles of this country. it pushes a radical american marxist agendahi. this is a corporation. what do we knew about this corporation? it is worse than fake news. try to take down in elected president donald trump and push a lot of offices supporting, investigation still support the various prosecutors and on and on. 1619 project to undermine the nations history and every one of the radical agenda items pushed by the new york times . we need to know more about the new york times . it is worse than fake news. it has been an extremely destructive force in this country in outside the country.t quantitative out the new york times . said that and here we go. in 1984 doctor david s weinman talks about the holocaust and it s the land is explaining
at this and was appalled in lacs coverage at the outset in the united states, two or three clear statements m would move this into public view but kept it there for some time. but the president was not so inclined. nor did washington reporters pressed him in retrospect it seems almost applicable in roosevelt s press conference normally held twice a week not one word spoken about the mass killing of european jews until almost one year later. the president had nothing to say on the mayor in new h correspondence. the new york times with a wide reach of resources and
but looked at this and was appalled in 1984. november 24, 1942 unambiguous evidence of the nazi ongoing extermination of european jews was made publicly available. it was largely ignored by the media. lack of solid press coverage in the weeks immediately following november 24 muffled by historic news at the outset. any united states he asserted two or three clear statements from franklin roosevelt would move this into public view and kept there for some time. but the president was not so inclined. nor did washington reporters press. it seems almost unbelievable that in roosevelt s press conference normally held twice a week, not one word was spoken about the mass killing of european jews until almost one year later. they had nothing to say to reporters and no correspondent asked. shirley the new york times
but looked at this and was appalled in 1984. november 24, 1942 unambiguous evidence of the nazi ongoing extermination of european jews was made publicly available. it was largely ignored by the media. lack of solid press coverage in the weeks immediately following november 24 muffled by historic news at the outset. any united states he asserted two or three clear statements from franklin roosevelt would move this into public view and kept there for some time. but the president was not so inclined. nor did washington reporters press. it seems almost unbelievable that in roosevelt s press conference normally held twice a week, not one word was spoken about the mass killing of european jews until almost one year later. they had nothing to say to reporters and no correspondent asked. shirley the new york times