Concern to me. We are going from a 3500 unit building to a 4800 unit building , but if we are going to two decent sized units, i am good with that. I get there some impact, but i think weve got to look at the zoning and kind of maximize out the number of units that we can add here. Granted, we can add an a. D. U. Under the current zoning, im just suspect that it gets a little Winchester Mystery House and the layout. I take d. R. , approve the project eliminating the a. D. U. And incorporating that into the lower unit. It is a little counter to what we asked for before, and we dont have those plans necessarily, but even if that is the intent, we want to continue with some direction to the project sponsor, but let me try that. I will make a motion to take d. R. And approve the project, incorporating the a. D. U. Into the laurel unit to get us two equal sized units and approve the project. Second. There is a motion that has been seconded to take d. R. And approve the project with modifica
It. And also, we did research about the impact of the Third Addition from the front street and the back street. From the front street, these red lines are the site that you can see. So according to this research, you can see only a bit of the building above, the corner of the building. So we dabble that you can see, you know, the third story from the front street. But we dont recognise it because of this setback. I did research about the visibility from the backyard, the alley. And according to my research, the elevation angle, the difference between the elevation angle between the second and third story is only 7degrees. So if we had a third story, our elevation angle differs, increase of only 7degrees. Its not like 35 or 45. So its not that much. So based on the research, i concluded that not much skyview is blocked by the audition of the third floor. Im the owner of this property and would like to thank you for your time today and would like to mention one thing that there are three
Invasive to privacy. Private views are not protected by the planning code or the design guidelines. Staff recommends not taking d. R. And approving the project because there were no exceptionally or extruder conditions. Can we hear from the d. R. Requesters . Good afternoon. Im here today because i believe the proposed project would have a Significant Impact on me, mainly the diminished to use an increase in the of the glare in the morning and increase of the openness and diminished property. We have a deck that is off our kitchen and breakfast room area. This is a place where our grandchildren play and we enjoy the sunlight and existing view that is our private area. It will affect our downstairs family room and affect the loss of sunlight in the afternoon and the diminished privacy. Our bedroom also faces west and will suffer the same fate and an increase glare in the mornings. These are our most favourite places in the home and we are sensitive to conditions that will affect them. T
I would say that, i would agree with ian. Public to push back a little on the slippery slope trajectory of skirting the essentialist line. But also to say that i think the Politics Around it can be articulated in particular ways that would also make for me would have appreciable differences with the motivations and the reasons and the justifications for taking a decision not to invest a i with this kind of responsibility and authority. We could also add one other thing, before we opened things up. Is maybe if i come in trying to think of ways to civil by the approach to the kind of claim we are making in a way that might be useful, there is always risks with the simplification. People will look at a policy debate going right now in universities is the idea of using these robot grading systems, these Automated Systems are grading College Students essays which are of course important, particularly for universities that like the Business Model of the mooc because how to take revenge of th