two-year degree, your number is 202-737-0001, if a four-year degree, 202-737-0002 or if you have no degree, 202-628-0205. you can also send us an email at journal@c-span.org. we want to talk about the impact of the cost of going to college and the impact of the cost on your education. this little article in the new york post sort of scums up what s happening on critical and here in washington regarding the assistance of helping to pay for a college education. student loan brawl, the house narrowly passed a bill yesterday that would stop the interest rates on federal loans from doubling this summer. but it would face a white house veto threat if passed. republicans and democrats both want to stop stafford loans from jumps from 3.4% to 6.8% in july. they just can t agree on how to pay the $5.9% cost. the g.o.p. would take democrat funds and the democrats would subsidize it with higher taxes on the rich. so we will continue our discussion regarding the impact of the cost on ed
before they become seve. women in particular will benefit from this prevention fund which would provide for hundreds of thousands of screenings for breast and cervical cancer. this is already happening. this would have to stop under this bill. so let s back up for a moment and say we all want the most educated population in our country so people can reach their self-fulfillment, whever thedecide it is, so we can be competitive in world markets, so we can have an informed electorate. in the spirit of the g.i. bill, which educated the our soldie when they came home, created a middle class in our country which is the backbone of our democracy, and in a global economy even more necessary for us to be able to have the skls and trained work force in order to compete. let s also recognize that nothing brings more money to the treasury than the education of the american people, whether it s early childhood, k-12, higherducation, postgrad, lifetime learning,othing brings more money
programs that are expecting constant cost burdens will not survive, poorly performing programs will not survive. or should not survive. here again in gay has done a terrific job in a number of areas, gmt bad, sm3 and so forth to incentivize schedule and alternatively penalize the schedule slips. look into the supply chain in our missile manufacturing, and understand where we can realize better value in the supply chain, provide incentives to prime contractors to realize that value differentially reward them, subcontractor by subcontractor according to the performance that they realize. qualify additional suppliers where you find a supplier who has consistently underperforming or charging too much, and where it becomes worthwhile to qualify a second supplier. and so for all of the blocking and tackling it takes to turn a will cost estimate into a should cost estimate, meaning and amount of money that taxpayers should
most of them, dom oral argument with a fairly conception of the case. what they use oral argument for varies according to the justice, and it turns out some use oral argument to try to persuade fellow justices of the view that they already have. the fact that he comes to the case with a preconception about the case is not doesn t distinguish him from the other justices. do you think, though if there were cameras, if there were camera as howed in oral arguments it would make a difference? no, i don t think so. as i said, i think that that is his style. you know, different people have different styles. they certainly do. that s a very good point. each to their own, right? roger pilon, thanks for coming on. appreciate your time. you re welcome. internet freedom is sparking revolutions in the middle east. we have been watching it. but what happens when a government wants to pull your plug? how does that work? could the u.s. ever do that?
issues before he gets there. roger, as you talk about that, it seems as if he would come with a predetermined judgment when he s walking in there to hear cases coming before him. so, to me, when i hear this, doesn t that mean that he s probably coming in there with, as i said, a predetermined judgment about something he s supposed to keep an open mind to? most of the justices i dare say come to cases and come to oral argument with a pretty clear conception of what the case is about, and you can see that in their questions. now, sometimes they use the questioning to try to convince their fellow justices if he s not using any questions, though, and this is specifically about him, how can we say that that but that s right. go ahead. but that doesn t mean we can read into that, that he has an open mind or not an open mind. all the justices, as i said, or