with or without exceptions for rape and incest, come up with creative acts over and over so the republicans have to make a record and we can beat them because the american people support having a woman be able to control her own body, and let s take advantage of that. talking about polling showing from nbc news showing a majority of americans, over 50%, believe women should have safe and legal access to abortion. about 40% think that should not be the case. cynthia, you ve talked about what can be done legislatively. let me talk about the judicial piece. julia notes and notes well, the law was crafted, designed to be challenge proof, that s the attempt. i wonder if the crux of the challenge, the vigilanteism, bounty hunter provision, that let s people that don t live in texas or have connection to the patient seeking an abortion sue people who help anyone get an
wade, therefore will go to the supreme court, have them weigh in and it will be struck down. this particular law from texas really didn t address rowe versus wade because it doesn t put enforcement on the state, puts it on the citizen, the person that decides to privately sue anyone related to helping a woman get an abortion. until one of the lawsuits actually happens and the federal government can challenge it and see that make its way to the supreme court and there can be open, oral argument before the supreme court about whether or not that person has standing, it is hard for them to challenge the law. and it was written that way, hallie, written to be challenge proof. all that merrick garland is talking about is using the face act, supposed to protect women that might be intimidated out of getting an abortion, protects the physical property of a clinic. as we know in texas, by and