from a serious attack on a judicial review, but the intent was there and may return. it proposed legislation to allow the police to stop and search anyone at a protest meeting without any cause for suspicion. attempted to legislate to allow the police to impose conditions on a protest march is likely to be noisy. these are not the only examples i can think of. apart from being almost certainly unworkable, such proposals will have alienated the public from the police. i m old enough to recall anti poll tax marchers, and anti brexit much as that attracted huge numbers and were most certainly noisy. with those had been banned under those sorts of legislation is? because the intent was not to prevent the public going
credited with taking down the gunman. you pray and hope you never have to go to that extreme. reporter: following a shooting in texas two years ago, state lawmakers passed legislation allowing handguns in places of worship and churches to form security teams. if there is any church in this state in america that was prepared for this, it was this church. reporter: authorities are still learning more about the gunman who has been described as relatively transient by the fbi. my understanding is more of a loaner and probably very difficult to determine exactly what his motivations were other than maybe mental illness. reporter: the victims, two men who simply went to worship on a sunday, a church. he always wanted us to be in the church. he was auld my rode model. reporter: one of them identified as tony wallace, a deacon of the church. god wanted him more than we did. they couldn t handle his
effective ways to cut off funds. . pretty unthinkable. so, the most. effective ways to cut off funds. and there effective ways to cut off funds. and there was effective ways to cut off funds. and there was a effective ways to cut off funds. and there was a great effective ways to cut off funds. and there was a great article effective ways to cut off funds. and there was a great article in - effective ways to cut off funds. and there was a great article in the - there was a great article in the atlantic there was a great article in the atlantic where there was a great article in the atlantic where she there was a great article in the atlantic where she sort - there was a great article in the atlantic where she sort of - there was a great article in thej atlantic where she sort of rode there was a great article in the - atlantic where she sort of rode the speech atlantic where she sort of rode the speech that atlantic where she sort of rode the speech that our atlanti
something that blames ukraine militarily for attacking the russians and that will be his move to broaden the campaign. look, there are still different views here of what would happen. general marks, i know you agree with much of what he said, that there are great risks, but you think it is possible, still, that this ends up being almost bloodless like crimea in 2014. tell me why. not entirely bloodless, but yeah, i think this is going to approximate more crimea than the baltics in the 90s as we all remember as a horrible slaughter, but then the u.s. rode in and the stable of veteran forces, et cetera. what we have in the donbas is we already have a large russian presence, so the increase of peacekeepers. let me pause for a second. these aren t peacekeepers, these are peacemakers. piecekeepers don t choose a side.
essentially china taking u.s. intelligence to assist russia. that s exactly right. we need to wake up and understand the china and russia now have a de facto alliance. they are working together to undermine the united states. there is an idea that we can just focus on the china threat and kind of wash our hands of what s happening in europe. it doesn t work like that. you talk about a timeline, a really quick timeline, 1-4 days. we have time later down the rode to mitigate what s happening up to this point. i m interested in policy decisions immediately. we need to expedite arms into ukraine. we can do it through poland. they need more javelins. it s been stuck in bureaucratic inertia. poland wants these things. our baltic allies want us to shore up their own defenses. we need to get stuff to the ukrainian people. we ve been telling our allies we need to tell mike you need to care about your country more than we care about your country.