This week, the
TTAB decided the appeals from
the three Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion refusals summarized
below. At least one of the three refusals was affirmed. Let s
see how you do in divining the results. [Answer will be found in
the first comment.]
In re Jacqueline Anne Occasions, LLC, Application Serial
No. 88264864 (April 20, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge
Robert H. Coggins). [Section 2(d) refusal of
JACQUELINE
ANNE OCCASIONS [OCCASIONS disclaimed] in view of the
registered mark
JACQUELINE EVENTS & DESIGN
[EVENTS & DESIGN disclaimed], for overlapping wedding planning
services. Applicant argued that the commercial impression of the
marks differ because the cited mark is highly suggestive of a
TTABlog Test: Which Of These Section 2(d) Refusals Was/Were Reversed? - Intellectual Property mondaq.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from mondaq.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.