determine what his state of mind was with respect to them. because in order to prove obstruction of justice you have to have an intent to obstruct justice. and so this gives mueller the opportunity to look in a sense into the mind of the president and analyze his actions in light of that now-known fact that he wanted to fire him. so i think it will be informative of the president s of mueller s review of the president s actions when he comes down to the interview. robert, what do you think about the president nearly firing robert mueller, especially when you consider the reaction when he fired james comey. seriously, this is a bunch of speculation and a whole with you bunch of ridiculous nonsense. i mean i understand the now supposed mosaic theory of obstruction of justice. nobody during watergate claimed that richard nixon committed obstruction of justice in firing archibald cox. that was not the obstruction piece. and again the notion that the
some of trump s white house folks i think scaramucci was on earlier by the way why is any davos. that was my question when i saw him there. go on. but you saw him asking why now? and you know, it tells us a couple of things. it tells us that the hints we had before that mueller is is really good at keeping information confidential seems to be proving to be true right now. and it also tells me that somebody is feeling the squeeze and feels the need to get this information out on behalf of don mcgann, whether mcgann himself or somebody who cares about mcgann, it certainly seem to be an effort to paint him in a good light. i thank you for your time. and by the way i didn t do it your face i called you schwab earlier. i m sure it happens a lot. if you get anywhere in the neighborhood of schab i ll be happy. appreciate your time. bringing in robert ray who a