To you believe and cooperated with them videos who might have a disagreement that comes together and build a coalition. I see giving up on at the principle of nonaggression will have a smaller nsa, little bit of Government Intervention. A little bit of welfarism. And well have the president fight little wars but not big wars elm thats why its so dangerous. You endorse the principle 100 , and i think that is wrong. So you find other people where you can come together and build coalitions and thats where the answer will be found to the stalemate in washington. Host when you see what is going on right now, the house, the senate, the president , and they all want to Work Together, but nothing seems to be getting done. Whats your. Guest im not sure they Work Together. Both parties agree on the big issues, but they dont want to Work Together if theyre looking for power. Power is a real struggle. People want to end the power and take care of friends and thats a very real issue. I think the pr
It has been a big big problem. We dont have an efficient immigration service. I think it shouldve been much more efficient. I think work should have become available more easily. I think if a legal people come in they should get no subsidies. They shouldnt get Free Health Care and Free Education that we should be more generous in allowing people to calm and work. There were so some time that happened and it would be a Great Service to our country. The frear we are the more we would welcome people who come in and help us out because we would be getting wealthier. The best we have on the borders are complicated because of the drug laws. The drug lords are fighting and killing with each other. This is why i have always fought against the war on drugs. They have these consequences that we have a lot of criminals on the borders and a lot of money involved. Its not just because there is a bunch of bad people we cant get along with the mexican people. That is probably way down on the list of
Coalition. If in the conventional definition of moderation. If i want to be a true freemarket person i have to give up all little bit of freemarket in order to get cooperate with someone else. I see giving up on the principles of nonaggression on Foreign Policy and the protection of Civil Liberties will have a smaller nsa, a little Government Intervention, a little bit of welfare, the president fight little wars but not big wars. That is so dangerous because you endorse the principle 100 and that is wrong so we find other people where you come together and build a coalitions and that is where the answer will be found in a stalemate in washington. Host when you see what is going on, the house, the senate, the president , they want to Work Together but nothing seems to be getting done. They Work Together, both parties agree on the big issues, they dont have any disagreement but dont want to Work Together if they are looking for power. Power is a real struggle. People want to have power a
50 essential issues that affect our freedom you write that socalled moderate politicians compromise and seek bipartisanship are the most dangerous among the entire crew in washington. Compromise is too often synonymous with selling out by the sounds a lot better. Guest moderation always sounds good and people want it. We all want to feel moderate and fair reasonable people so it does sell in politics but theres a difference between moderation where you sacrifice something you believe and cooperating with somebody else who might have a disagreement where you come together and do a coalition. Coalition. If in the conventional definition of moderation is if i want to be a true free market person, what i have to do is give up a little bit of free market in order to get to incorporate for somebody else so i see giving up on nonaggression and foreignpolicy and also on the protection of Civil Liberties will have a smaller nsa. We will have a little bit of Government Intervention. We will have
Controversy and impact on our freedom and the second question our current immigration challenge to our security and our liberty. Thank you. Agenda 21 this u. N. Stuff and trying to usurp more for sovereignty. I dont believe in the u. N. And i dont believe we should be in it but we are in agenda 21 so that would be dismissed in a libertarian society. On immigration we have talked a little bit about that. That is more complex but its a consequence of bad policy, bad economic policy, people in this country who wouldnt take a job from outside and wanting to work, a weak economy. It makes people very nervous and jobs are being stolen. It has been a big big problem. We dont have an efficient immigration service. I think it shouldve been much more efficient. I think work should have become available more easily. I think if a legal people come in they should get no subsidies. They shouldnt get Free Health Care and Free Education that we should be more generous in allowing people to calm and wo