a man who leads by 30 points in polls. donald trump and the jury did this at the urging of a man called alvin bragg. he s the manhattan district attorney who has been famous so far by making the city much more dangerous by refusing to enforce laws against crimes like robbery and . now, we don t know at this hour what the indictment says. we don t know specifically what the charges are. but previous news reports suggest they will emanate from an alleged payment. seven years ago, a payment that federal regulators said violated no law, but that alvin bragg apparently believes is a crime, either way, the net result is donald trump is the first former president of the united states ever to be indicted. so what happens next? we can be certain there is no coming back from this moment. there could be retaliation from red states. the governor of florida has already said ron desantis already issued a statement saying that he will not participate in any extradition of donald trump to
election. we also that the grand jury waaa empaneled by a soros funded d.a. called alvin bragg, who looks and acts like ta tawanna brawley era, alvidenc sharpton. so we would assumee on the bass of that evidence that it s pretty likely trump does get charged with something at some point. but charged with what? in a fre that s the question. that should matter in a free country, laws or universal laws apply to all citizens equally precisely because all citizens i are considered equal forou generations. this was very obviouss to ami to american liberals. in fact, iact was the basis ofel their worldview that was back when liberals opposedas jim crow.om and we re notet tryinhing cg to reinstate it as something called equitequiy. we are not liberals, but we retain the traditional american view, which is that laws must be applied equally or else they are not laws at all. justice must be blind or elsejut it is tyranny. so we spent the day with helpp f staff toyer on our staff t
weekend. a former nfl star is here first, r tonight with reaction. but first rule and ruin. that s the focus ofngle tonight s angle, of course, yor a radical new york prosecutors trying to take down trumpthis before 2024 da. you this apparent move toward indicting the former president . it sd indi as predictable as a biden stumble climbing the stairs of s air force one now rather than aa focusing on putting way violent to mak criminals. dalven bragge wants to makes as a name for himself by squaring p off with donald trump on a case that is as pathetic as itl. is political brag made a future trump prosecution the cornerstone of his campaign for d.a. on the candidate in deputy the race. who has the experience with donald trum in p. i was the chief deputy in the attorney general s office. we sued the trum0 times. iptigae administration over a hundred times. i know how to litigate with them. one little problem fo r alvin ,nothing to brag about. his only path of admission into
a convicted felon who s known for stretching the truth. cohen s former legal adviser, a man named robert castelo, who testified before this grand jury, was on tucker carlson tonight back on march 20th. watch this. i called them up after i saw michael cohen on tv stating things that he said he was going to tell the grand jury and had told the grand jury that were contrary to what he told us when we first represented him in april. of 2018. so i m sitting at home watching these lies and i said , i ve got to do something about it. okay, so we still don t know what the actual charges are because it s unlikely they ll be unsealed until the former president legally surrenders, which likely would happen sometime next week. donald trump issued a statement about the indictment. it reads in part quoting here, the democrats have lied, cheated and stolen in their obsession with trying to get trump. but now they ve done the unthinkable, indicting a completely innocent person in an act of bla
discredited by his own former legal adviser, robert castelo. take a look. i just spent two hours or so testifying before the grand jury in downtown manhattan. and i got my point across, although it was clear to me that the manhattan d.a. s office did not want to get to the truth. i need to explain that a little . but i called them up after i saw michael cohen on tv stating things that he said he was going to tell the grand jury and had told the grand jury that were contrary to what he told us when we first represented him in april of 2018. so i m sitting at home watching these lies and i said , i ve got to do something about it. i don t represent donald trump, but i do stand for justice. and i think i have a legal obligation to inform both sides. so that s what i did. so what does this testimony actually mean for the case going forward? in just a moment, we ll review