looking into until that photograph or at least that s the story they are giving. so, i mean, obviously, if chief of staff kelly and white house counsel and the security guy, if all three of them, and we don t know, but if all three of them had learned of this and kept him on board, either they didn t think it was a big deal, or, and i suspect this to be the case based on the initial statements, porter sold them a bill that it was not true, the women are crazy or whatever, and they said they believed him. the reason i say that is i didn t pluck that out of thin air if you read cnn s reporting, daily mail s reporting, breaking the story, the pattern is that the second ex-wife said i knew about the abuse of the first ex-wife, but rob said they had a crazy relationship relationship, and it was both of their faults, and i believed him, and then it happened to me.
think, but wait a second, the guy abused two ex-wives, what are we talking about here? it was not that long ago either in the 2000s. sorry, before he worked at the white house, which is the most irrelevant and absurd point. he s an abuser then, he is an abuser now, so, look, he s not in an easy spot here. he is still choosing to work for this guy, but, ultimately, this is not about fbi process or background checks. this is about whether john kely and donald trump think it s okay to have an abuser in the white house, an they do. i want to play the sound i referred to earlier. sound number four, about what changed, why was the kelly initial statement different from the second statement. reports are troubling, and i think the statement from wednesday night reflects the rob porter we saw in the news reports and credible allegations. to be clear, what was so shocking that changed? you said it was shocking.