My name is tammy myers, i am president of the gettysburg heritage center, and i have drilled to have you here in attendance. He is a retired executive a licensed battlefield guide here at Gettysburg National military park. Joe is the past president of the association of licensed battlefield guides and the gettysburg civil war roundtable. In addition, he is on the faculty of the prestigious lincoln leadership institute. He has three books to his credit including after gettysburg, lee retreats and another. He lives with his wife, chris. Thank you. [applause] my wife kris is here in the audience tonight. Welcome, everybody to the book talk about my latest book called after gettysburg. The great radio commentator always talked about the rest of the story, so this is kind of the rest of the story. A lot of people come here to learn about the threeday battle of gettysburg. We talked about that battle, but this book attempts to answer the question what happens after the three days are over .
Appellants request, including removal of roof deck and privacy including nonoperable frosted grass windows and privacy screen. With these modifications added, there is no impact on the privacy to the rear yard of appellants home. This is the sensitively designed, smallscale Development Needed for the west side of town to do its part to address the housing crisis the Planning Commission saw that and unanimously approved it. It meets all criteria of 317 for approval of demolition and replacement. The project was before the Planning Commission because 317 requires conditional approval for demolition. Joe purchased the house in 2015 from the estate of the former owner, who owneroccupied until his death in 2014. Its been vacant since of the Planning Commission found that there was all the relevant data. It is not subject to rent control and no tenants were or are being replaced. It replaces one unit with three and three bedrooms with eight bedrooms. It closely conforms to rm1 zoning and the
Submit. Thank you. Clerk supervisor farrell . Councillor farrell thank you. I want to back up what supervisor cohen just said and supervisor breed. And now acting mayor breed said earlier. One thing i want to share with everyone. People ask us, what is your memory of mayor lee . And i want it share something from last thursday, which is the last time i saw him. We were at the Christmas Tree lighting at mclaren lodge, the official San Francisco Christmas Tree. I went up on stage with him. For the first time, my children came with me on stage for the first time. And my little guy, who just turned 5 years old, he thought that he was going to be the one to flip the switch and turn on the Christmas Tree lights. I told him that was not the case. Thats the mayors job and his prerogative to do so. Apparently the mayor heard me talking to him. And so when the mayor went up, he motioned to my son and they kind of held hands on top of each other and flipped the switch together with a bunch of oth
Our project has been described as massive, monolithic and out of character with its neighbors as an anomaly in an area dominated by smaller buildings. The facts dont bear this out. The diagram indicates in red the 4th stories of a large number of existing buildings in both the contiguous and surrounding blocks. The vast majority of these buildings contain four stories that represent 100 of their overall footprints with no setbacks at all. The appellants 2story building is indicated in yellow and you can see theres a partial 4th floor on the building next door to his building to the east. To the west, the corner building at lake and 27th avenue is 3 stories. But as steve mentioned, its capped by a roof ands that large floortofloor heights bringing the Building Height up to 37 feet. This is 3 feet below our proposed roof line. This is not atypical at all for the block, as many older buildings of 3 stories are in the range of 35 to 37 feet. A proposed 4th level is shown in blue behind the
Approval of demolition and replacement. The project was before the Planning Commission because 317 requires conditional approval for demolition. Joe purchased the house in 2015 from the estate of the former owner, who owneroccupied until his death in 2014. Its been vacant since of the Planning Commission found that there was all the relevant data. It is not subject to rent control and no tenants were or are being replaced. It replaces one unit with three and three bedrooms with eight bedrooms. It closely conforms to rm1 zoning and the period urban design. Appellants did not oppose demolition at the Planning Commission or here. They presented no evidence that the Planning Commission approved its description in approving demolition. What appellants are seeking is removal of the 4th floor, which would eliminate a familysize limit in violation of the housing act and the owners plan. They got everything they asked for except that 4th floor being eliminated. The Planning Department realized