considering you can spread it with the vaccine anyway. you can spread the virus, even if exactly, laura. that s the problem. when the vaccines first came out we were told repeatedly by the drug companies, the white house, by so many others, this will prevent you getting infected and spreading it. we know that s no longer true. it was never true. now after so many months and years of experience now, we know that s absolutely false. what is the purpose of forcing people who are perfectly healthy, who are in some of the lowest risk strata to take something which we know also could have side effects. every medical decision is risk benefit ratio. when you have minimal to zero benefit that you have some risk, that ratio may not work out. frankly it is unethical because it is coercive. you course people to take something that put them at risk, even to people around them given what we know about vaccines. on top of that, we have
dying from this virus. don t understand this.ns consideridering you can spread it with the vaccine anyway. you can spread the virus even if you re vaccinated.at s exactly, laura . the. and that s the problem is when the vaccine first came out, wed were told repeatedly by the drug companies, by the white house, by so many others thatu this will prevent you from getting infected and and spreadg it. w that is no longewer true. kno it was but now, after so many months not now, after so many months and years of experience, now we know it s absolutely false. so what is the purpose of are forcing people who are perfectly healthy, who are in some of the lowest risk strata to take something which we know also could have side effects? you every medical decision is at risk benefit ratio. and when you hav re minimal to zero benefit that you have some risk no matter how muchno that is , that risk benefit ratio may not work out. and so it s frankly, i think,un unethical because it s coercive and you