defendant. he s been dragged into the litigation. still, he wants to stay that litigation because he s saying i m involuntary, i don t want to answer questions while there s a criminal proceeding against me. meanwhile, he knows as a plaintiff in a defamation case, no court in the world is going to give him a break on discovery. you re the plan. why does he need a break on discovery? in fairness, it is a common thing when someone is a criminal defendant, they want to avoid being in any civil matter because once you get into discovery, you can be asked about anything reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible ef evidence. stephanie, i see your look of shock if i was an innocent woman but as a lawyer, we re in the business of risk avoidance. if i m representing a client, i don t want any extra testimony under oath that could come back to haunt him. even if that client truly believes he has nothing to hide.
this causes the blood inside the aneurism to clot effectively cutting it off from the bloodstream. and the other approach is open brain surgery. for this the doctors must clock the shortest path possible to be on your resume. they make their way carefully. delicately very place a titanium clip on the aneurysm pinching it off at its base this can soft blood flow to the extrusion removing the risk of rupture such procedures are now almost routine but they re not without risk avoidance of both the surgical process and the end of vascular procedure are invasive the possibility for complications in the brain is always present. uncut camp decided to undergo surgery despite the
attitude towards science, neglect of evidence. where people fire and wide seem comfortable substituting wishful thinking and opinion and ideology for evidence. and they have removed climate change from epa s documents and websi website. and removing questions from various surveys. the state department said instead of saying sex ed, sexual education, you should talk about sexual risk avoidance. so, you know, this epidemic of neglect of evidence is really serious. because if you want policies and regulations that work, they should be based on our best understanding of how things are. yeah. and that s what science is.
the viewers may understand, it basically means that rebekah brooks and her husband, charlie, have been charged with effectively concealing evidence from the police, as they looked into phone hacking at the disgraced tabloid owned by rupert murdoch, the news of the world. that tabloid closed down last summer but the repercussions of the phone hacking scandal continue to ripple through british society, and internationally as well, of course, but this is significant, because it s the first set of charges to be brought since the original scandal broke back in 2006, and the royal reporter, clive goodman and another were charged with phone hacking. now the ceo of the parent company, news international, and her husband and various other staff members have been charged with perverting the course of justice, concealing evidence from the police, attempting, it is alleged, to effectively cover up what was going on from the police, specifically with removing documents from the archive
difficult question. let me just talk about the senate. when i came here the first two years, you could offer an amendment any time on anything. and people weren t afraid to vote yes or no. we have politicians so afraid for the next election that our leaderships what their whole goal is to protect them so they don t have to make a vote. what did we come here for? if you can t defend a vote for or against something, you shouldn t be here in the first place. and now it s all risk avoidance, we don t want anybody to have to vote because it might affect their election, which might affect the mix of congress. well, that s a paralysis that s killing our country at the very time when we need statesmanship and leadership that will say we re going to think long-term, we re going to solve the big problems. and okay, so somebody loses an election, the country gets well down the road and is better off. it s just so disappointing. it is. i want to ask about the payroll tax holiday bill, which is