contraception, consensual sex between adults and same-sex marriage, which means next on clarence thomas s list are to get rid of all those things. if you are in a same-sex marriage, this may be the time to think about protective legal arrangements, about you on your spouse, your property in your finances. a list of what rights they are going to abolish next, being in a same-sex marriage now means there is a target on you from this court, and this court has proven themselves to be absolutely unconstrained, and only by precedent, not only by consistency of previous reasoning, but from any concern. of public opinion. take that seriously. tactically, that notice from justice thomas today, lining up those righties ready to get rid of next, i believe that will have a practical effect on this political movement from which he and his colleagues have emerged. he has put out that list now of what they are going to go after next. he put it in writing, in his concurrence today, watch for action
0 southern baptist convention. reactions to roe v. wade were also really heterogeneous for a long time between the two political parties. there were plenty of antiabortion democrats, and there were lots of pro-choice republicans. republican governors wrote the forefront of decriminalizing of abortion in the states in the 1960s. including the governor of california, a man named ronald reagan. in 1967, ronald reagan signed into law the most liberal abortion rights bill in the country in california. so, it s not that there was not disagreement over abortion, or that there weren t strong feelings from various quarters about roe v. wade. but it was different. and specifically, it wasn t really a politics issue. it wasn t an issue that swayed election, or that was a key part of the two parties political platforms. contrary to popular belief, roe v. wade in 1973 did not spark some kind of immediate big backlash among conservatives, and evangelicals and republicans. it evolved differently, and
qualified blind trust is that it only works if it is truly blind. it is better to focus on increasing transparency through disclosure. disclosure has not worked. if anything, disclosure has disclosure of financial transactions puts it glaringly obviously to the public that the interests conflicts and there. divestment is an option. it s an option that is pressed for-able. forced divestment is the option you are talking about, right? you use force. i would say that being in public service is a choice. whatever happens here, we have to keep in mind that every person in this room is an american citizen that has rights and freedom. part of that righties to participate in a market economy. it seems there are more complications and it would seem at first blush. with us tonight, the man himself, dave levinthal, deputy washington bureau chief for insider. his extensive reporting on the
airlines allowing employees to wear blm pens, but now when non libs or righties are doing it the left is saying hey, that s not fair. i wonder what the man himself thinks of all this? they told me i can t talk about brandon. going to get in trouble here fo talking about brandon. but i want to talk about him. let s go brandon, let s go brandon. and never see the guy. use afraid of me. i ll give him one of my five finger discount. let s go brandon. it s got a different meaning now , let s go brandon. i could probably do more push-ups than you and all your cousins. i don t think, this has
because it works for your business model and the time has come. you have to flip it and show us you can t do what you re being asked to do. the most egregious of it all, the people that have the biggest platform on social media. all righties. all of them are righties. listen, if you want to call it legacy media, conservative media does the same thing. they have no they have no real protocol. they have no real structure in what they say what they want. they put headlines and things and write about things. they say it s opinion. but most people we would never even put it on, give it the light of day that s because we have news accountability. that s the the whole nighttime lineup is entertainment. but fox and they said they shouldn t put news behind it and social media should do the same thing. they shouldn t be able to put things out there and with, you know. because they know.