but even then i wouldn t. it doesn t mean anything. does it have any meaning at all? no. first of all, i would let the sleeping big dog lie here. don t give bill clinton they hate clinton. i know, but don t give bill clinton an excuse to be righteously in dig anatomy in public and campaign fat the sam time. we take seriodon t take seriouse of the other party. we just don t. he thought he was trying to be clever and stir mischief among the democrats. it won t work and nobody was listening. what do you make of that? it was obviously aimed at stirring trouble, but what s it about? it s not surprising. actually, hal stein in the huffington post had a great analysis of this. mccain tried to do this to some
stirring and righteously angry piece. and let me just read awe quote. she said i chose to address it because the conversation was pointedly nasty, gendered and misogynistic and embodies what all girls and women in our culture to a greater or lesser degree endure every day. in ways both outrageous and subtle. the assault on our body image, the hypersexualization of girls and women and subsequent degradation of our sexuality as we walk through the decades. and the general incessant objectification is what this conversation allegedly about my face is really about. and it struck me that in this week in which we were having a very substantive conversation about this cable news pundit saying something and about the role of women, it happens against a backdrop against which this is the norm. the this kind of extremely intense objectification about women s appearance, and let s be honest, it happened to sarah palin in all sorts of gross and disgusting ways. it happened to hillary clinton. it h
that conversation? and how was that decision swayed? really, what was there other than his word that would make them have a doubt in and it was detailed by the police as though there was some sort of rich layer of evidence. but it really was only his word as far as we can tell. and zimmerman s first lawyer was asked about any medical records. do you have anything to show us? any documentation of treating these injuries? and he just wouldn t answer the question. and if you had a hospital record from the next day or from any time period even close to this, you d say, yeah, we have this. and the truth is that a person who righteously uses deadly force on somebody, they don t have to misrepresent. they don t have to embellish. the tell the story the way it is. they tell it straight up. it s when you catch people in embellishments that red flags go up. charles, there s so many i mean, i tried to get the basic things that we re looking at. it seems to me that the only thing the law
really, what was there other than his word that would make them have a doubt in and it was detailed by the police as though there was some sort of rich layer of evidence. but it really was only his word as far as we can tell. and zimmerman s first lawyer was asked about any medical records. do you have anything to show us? any documentation of treating these injuries? and he just wouldn t answer the question. and if you had a hospital record from the next day or from any time period even close to this, you d say, yeah, we have this. and the truth is that a person who righteously uses deadly force on somebody, they don t have to misrepresent. they don t have to embellish. the tell the story the way it is. they tell it straight up. it s when you catch people in embellishments that red flags go up. charles, there s so many i mean, i tried to get the basic things that we re looking at. it seems to me that the only thing the lawyer can be heat about is just this little section of
that he did not expect for that book, calling for the end of social security, medicaid and jim, thanks for bringing that up. another potential for liability. for what perry said about social security and medicare and medicaid in the past. here s what he told the daily beast last fall i think every program needs to stand the sunshine of righteous scrutiny, whether it s social security, medicare, whether it s medicaid. you have $115 trillion of unfunded liability in those three. they re bankrupt, they re a ponzi scheme. so calling social security, wayne, a ponzi scheme to somebody watching right now this program, who s 65 or older and is getting social security, may not like the sound of it being trashed as a ponzi scheme. they may say, this is a legitimate thing i paid into when i was working for 50 year. i m now benefiting righteously from it. from it.