yesterday changed his story y to admit that he was a tt the da kennels where his wife and son were played, something he did not tell police at the time. at all of this the last time you saw your supposedly saw four wife and child, all o this detail, you as a lawyer and a prosecutor, didn t think that was important to offer impr on your own. sta o i think it s important. here and now that murdoch cop to and lying about being at the kennels, he toldd l.a. prosecutors today that when hen left his wife and son minutehes before they were slaughtered, no one else was around forwa the dogs. barking and carrying on or going out into the woods orng o acting like they said somebody was around that they didn t know. nd theyo, they weren t. there was nobody.there there was around it. the dogs didn t know.t know there was nobody else around. all right. .good for them to since. esse: bubut the most explosive moment of the day, murda putting his o forward his owwnn theory on whod
murdered his family. he believeered his family.s it t a boat accident involving his now deceased son , paul . deceaseddriving the family s boat drunk when he crashedd an and killed one of his friends. i didn t believe did any of the families, the people thatt e were involved in the boat wreck anything t had anything to do with hurting maggie and paul . but i can tell you that that time and as i sit here today, is the boaeve that boat reason why paul paul, maggie were killed. and so we ve got random vigilantes because of the boatem wreck. to no, i don t know thatvigila they re random vigilantes. well, you justnt said it wasn t the family or the kid orth their kids or the family of the other kids. igilantein the boat. right.o yo so i m just saying, is somebody off of social media and you don t have any evidence of that, do not? you just believe thatht you reao still on that jury, that as you try to explain the lie that youn told for the first time yesterday, that right? righ no,