in decline, and yet they go after a popular president,identa a president that they got more votes than any sittinguntr president in the history of our country by far. byand then much better the seco time in the election than the first. and they go after hi gm on a bo, his house just like the russia, russia, russia hoax and all of the others. this has been going on for seven years. thing onand they can t stop bece it s election interference aeytv the highest level. there s never been anything like what s happened. i m an innocener bee what t man. and i m an innocent person. they had the mueller hoax, the mueller report an person., t came out. no collusion after two and a half years that was set up by hillary clinton and democrat . but this is what they do.s this is what they dowhaty do so. if they would devote their energies to honesty and integrity, they would be a lot better for our country. they could do a lot better. they could do a lo.t of great oa things. now, on true so
equal application of our laws. am i hearing you right the l? ? you re hearing me right. junelet me say thi ares. today, what is today s date? june 8th. june 8th is the day of insurrection, not january 6th. a weaponized u.s . attorney.. at a weaponized attorney general of the uniteweapond states have unleashed the full force of the united states government agains fof the t a former president, the leading republican nominee to takthe leade on the presiden. we have never seen anything like this in, the united states. we saw it under stalin. we ve seen it in other autocracies, marxist regimes, i fascist regimes, the third world. but they have taken the uniteddh states of america and they have dragged us into a hole. . it is embarrassing. it s humiliating. and i m going to telthis is ,l you something. they re tens of millions of us. you have crossed the rubicon twice, which is never beene you.
done. and we will never forgive you. ner, ever. and that s the bottom line. i m done. mark levin, thank you. all right.an wek you. in now with fox contrir george washington law professor y with us.urleox contr jonathan, i want to getet your take on tonight s developmentsour take. well, you know, we have to see this indictment in termse of what the specifics are. what we do knoifics arw is thatg the justice department has gone with what are called the darlings of prosecutoron. these are crimes that they bring. quite often they win quiteey win alleging false statements, obstructio qn those are cases they are they tend to to make. o but really, i think the important thing here is that we re seeing if this indictmentrtt thing w has those. moments, because, you know, if this indictment is basically a bunch of a sort of close calls, i think there s going to be a great deal of recrimination. se a eao there have been leah