She writes. They all told me President Trump hadnt just dropped a single n word bomb but said it throughout the shows taping during outtakes particularly during the first season of the apprentice. I would look like the biggest M Imi Imbecile for working for a man like that. Start with you. Talking about omarosa and debate our glad or sad we are talking about this, this saturday morning. How does this change the picture we have of President Trump . Talking about existence of these tapes, hearing that word. Getting audio of it. How would that affect your understanding of this president . All we know is confirm what we already know. Shes essentially confirming his private conduct matches his
what happened charlottesville was appalling. This is still an opportunity for the president to turn it around to turn to his Speech Writers and say, write a speech for me. Who is it going to be . Stephen mill jer . And to hire new Speech Writers. He could he could be doing make an attempt. He cannot u
hearing but a six hour hearing with nine effectively defendants. and all the attorneys representing those defendants and the defendants are themselves lawyers. plus there s the judge riding herd over all of them and they were all on zoom. it wasn t like they were all in the same room. so you could piece them together from their voices coming from different places. the court reporter in this case has been asked to do a plea heroic work. and when we finally get the transcript of that hearing, it s probably gonna cost 1 million bucks. and that moment with the court reporter spoke saying listen, you can be interrupting each other because i m just gonna get a bunch of dashes here. i ve never seen him all like that with the court reporter but she did heroic work today, that s for sure. you have to push a court reporter really hard before they get to that point. yes. thank you rachel. thanks lawrence. well, texas house democrats are, in the words of the great, on the road again. aft
can t recall? what you re to make of the statement is that the subpoena was issued before he got there. you re saying that he was at the center of these things. what he was at the center of, as far as i know, was insisting that leak investigations generally, not necessarily these, leak investigations generally that have been languishing as to which there was a great deal of pressure from people in the defense department and defense community who are severely hurt by national security leaks, that those be prosecuted and pursued. and so he got somebody to take a look to see which were viable and which were not. as far as i know, there s absolutely no indication that he was riding herd on these particular matters or these particular congressmen. you do know there s an indication because there s new york times reporting that says exactly the opposite. the guy he brought in was from new jersey and had no experience with these kinds of things. the premise that was based on
department and defense community who are severely hurt by national security leaks, that those be prosecuted and pursued. and so he got somebody to take a look to see which were viable and which were not. as far as i know, there s absolutely no indication that he was riding herd on these particular matters or these particular congressmen. you do know there s an indication because there s new york times reporting that says exactly the opposite. the guy he brought in was from new jersey and had no experience with these kinds of things. the premise that was based on national security concerns, they declassified a lot of this information as they went along. so they took away their own premise. but we have interviews in the reporting of people chris who told the ag that there s nothing here and he said, reopen, keep going. he said to pursue cases generally. the notion of bringing in