and the peace talks, do we take these talks seriously if russia is not going to do a cease-fire during the talks? i mean, should we basically not take the talks seriously until there s a real cease-fire? reporter: i think we need to take the talks seriously because the ukrainians are taking it seriously, the russians apparently are taking them seriously, at least the foreign ministry is, but it all goes down to putin. this was a conflict launched by one man who you see his body language, each within his own advisers how he s been ridiculing them in public. so you could have the negotiators come to agreement. you could have the ukrainian government come to agreement. you can have all of the national community working toward an agreement because even turkey is getting involved as potential guaranteer of the neutrality agreement. unless putin sees that he s
i do want to go back this morning, i ended up turning to a channel that i never watch, just to see what, what was being said about the proceedings. i thought it was interesting that they were ridiculing some of my colleagues on this side of the aisle for bringing up the behavior of past supreme court hearings. this is really the appropriate venue to do it. i guess we could talk about it when we re reviewing intellectual property or something else, but contextually, this is the time to do that. and i think we all have to agree that the behavior in the kavanaugh hearing was inappropriate. i hope we never get back to it. and i hope we can all agree that many of the behavior or the positions that some of my colleagues took on the other side of the aisle with justice barrett was abhorrent and we should never do it again. that s why i m so glad that for the most part, we have behaved in an appropriate manner here. i m going to get to some
and it i m going to step aside and jason will take over. i will be back next week. hope you feel better. you look fine. raymond arroyo and i experienced this. laura: really guest host to need a guest host. we need a host with a voice. are you available? laura: it is live when it happened. you ve not stopped ridiculing him and giving him hell.
they are acting too late. you don t think the pain minister shows leadership now. where is your party showing leadership? fiur leadership now. where is your party showing leadership? showing leadership? our party has shown leadership showing leadership? our party has shown leadership at showing leadership? our party has shown leadership at every - showing leadership? our party has shown leadership at every single i shown leadership at every single stage if we go back 20 months of this crisis care every time has called the government to act. if you remember last summer the september before wanting to break, i don t accept that. i think we have followed the advice and we have called for measures to come into place in good time, and the prime minister even today where is the ridiculing terraced starmer at prime ministers question sign about blabbering in him jabbing. ministers question sign about blabbering in himjabbing. he continues to use completely unacceptable rhetoric that the
about jussie, i care about the media. how could anybody believe this? if you are a part of black america, not the media, not don lemon. if joy reid or don lemons says something automatically black people feel that way no. that is not the case. if you want to know how black people feel, go ask dave chappelle. when dave chappelle starts talking about jussie, that s how we were feeling, that s where we were at. we were laughing, we were ridiculing, we were having fun. i think when you talk about cancel culture and how people are afraid to speak up, black men were not afraid to speak up. black men were calling this for what it was at the beginning. because they were, they were called homophobic, they were toxic masculinity. it was something wrong with black men for laughing at what they obviously knew was a joke.