more u.s. attorneys in american history. but i m not aware of u.s. attorney, former u.s. attorney ever having been indicted. not aware of u.s. attorney for the southern district of new york, ever having been indicted. you have this job yourself. reflecting on what this means, what this means that it could come to this for a former u.s. attorney. it is quite a fall from grace to be charged. he is presumed innocent but i find it ironic that rudolph giuliani finds himself a defendant in a rico case. remember, it was giuliani who made a name for himself by prosecuting mobsters and even the wall street financiers, route using the rico statute. and then for him to get his own comeuppance as a member of a rico enterprise i think is irony or karma. but it s a very serious day. i think, as aimee said, all
legal peril that he is into the moment? ,, . :, legal peril that he is into the moment? ,, : :, . moment? signals too much of that he realised he needed moment? signals too much of that he realised he needed a moment? signals too much of that he realised he needed a talented - realised he needed a talented georgia realised he needed a talented georgia specific realised he needed a talented georgia specific attorney. - realised he needed a talented georgia specific attorney. we| realised he needed a talented i georgia specific attorney. we are not 1 size fits all georgia specific attorney. we are not 1 size fits all so georgia specific attorney. we are not 1 size fits all so there - georgia specific attorney. we are not 1 size fits all so there are l not 1 size fits all so there are those not 1 size fits all so there are those of not 1 size fits all so there are those of us not 1 size fits all so there are those of us from not 1 size fits all so there are those of us f
not exactly here in the federal statute, but fairly coast to catch up to defendants that we re trying to disperse their conduct as a way to avoid accountability. what you have here in fani willis and her team what they ve done with this indictment is tell the entire story. there s nowhere to hide. so that the jury when this gets to trial has a full understanding of the context of all these actions that were taken. it s a strong case. every case is only as strong as the evidence in trial. an indictment, there is allegations but once we get to trial we see a, i ll tell you this about fani wallace, she doesn t put a charge down unless she has evidence to back it up. it tells a strong story about the attempt to overthrow our election here in georgia. i wouldn t want to be one of the defendants in this case all tell you that. charlie bailey, thank you, sir, stella had the work being
the state, then he ll rule. it s not as simple as some were saying that because you are a federal official, state prosecutors cannot prosecutor. if that was a law that would be a quick motion. it is not the law. and needs to be again, the duties and responsibility as being a federal official. you worked, charlie, with fani willis when she was lead prosecutor on a cheating scandal. in that case 11 black educators were convicted of racketeering and conspiracy thing for cheating or enabling cheating on students standardized tests. the east on your experience with the racketeering charge in the state of georgia, how strong of a case do you think fani willis has here? it s a very strong case. the statute, the rico statute was written here in the state,