Supporting Charlie Baker for governor. That is because Charlie Baker has created jobs and fixed government. Charlie baker got people off of welfare and left massachusetts is first in jobs. In the massachusetts right direction. Im voting for Charlie Baker. She has been a powerful advocate for women and kids and one of the toughest opponents that wall street in the big banks have ever seen. Martha coakley is running for governor with a plan for an economy that works for everyone. So that people get the skills that they need to succeed. Mass transit, creating regional economies so that every area of the state can thrive. Martha insiders choice, she is our choice. Governor . Thats optimistic. Why . We were number one in job creation. Americas best health care company. Ask to our bipartisan and prochoice. Which is what we need. We can meet they we can make massachusetts great by lowering spending, controlling taxes, and requiring work for welfare. More jobs, dad . Ive done it before. Specia
[applause] good evening and welcome. Is distinctbate differences between Charlie Baker and Martha Coakley. And the differences by the candidates and speaking to each other directly. There is one rule we will follow and that is timekeeping. The candidates will put a peri od at the end of their sentence when they are done. Give a huge front of a pause to mark Martha Coakley and Charlie Baker. Applause to Martha Coakley and Charlie Baker. [applause] charlie, you won the coin toss. You said you have done nothing wrong and you said you have done nothing wrong. You made a 10,000 donation to the Republican State Committee and several months laters, the state of new jersey invested 15 million in a company you were in. How to does not violate new jerseys rules . I have been transparent. Raised, theue was attorney happened to be the former general counsel and i gave to my Employment Contract plus every other document asociated as said if there is problem here, please tell me what it is and i wil
Alloweve we should private colleges and universities to compete with public universities because it is competition that provides better opportunities. If they have a higher loan default rate, lets tighten the standards. Lets not put colleges or universities out of business as the senator has done. I believe greater use of technology such as learning over the web, taking advantage of the very best teachers would provide a way to bring down some of the cost of education. We need to move in those directions. The next question is from laura washington. Voters say they are turned off by all the negative and misleading ads of the campaign. Same here. In one of your ads, you accused your opponent of spying on citizens, putting millions of dollars in his own pocket and being the father of d. C. Gridlock. What is the factual basis for those allegations . Public documents show he has received in excess of 9 million of lobbyist money. Clearly, that is influenced some of his votes in legislation.