Death penalty and my name is dale. I teach law at georgetown and to run a Supreme Court practice. We are here to talk about the Death Penalty, where its going and i cant imagine a better group of panelists. Over here is the president of the Southern Center for human rights. You know in my mind the leading Death Penalty litigants in the country. And has been for a number of years traveling throughout the country to bring these cases. He had a big one in the Supreme Court or couple weeks ago ago which may be i will tell you a little bit about that hes been teaching at Yale Law School since 1993 which yesterday was significant because that was my first class on the Death Penalty which he taught and was just a marvelous in its rationale figure and its a delight to be here with him. Roy adams is the director of the center for effective justice of the texas Public Policy center. Mark does interesting work in the cause of the criminal Justice System and is making the case for a conservative c
Private person and power that can be abused by turning the coercive machinery so this data can the people it has pledged to protect. Of course, this is a blind spot for the establishment. If theres one thing washington in writers are united on, it is love of power and a complete lack of suspicion. Sure theres other power, but it is just fine for washington in writers. The only trick is making sure it is in the right hands. For libertarians, suspicion of power is in our dna. So many efforts to reorient politics in this direction should come as welcome news on our part. And for my part, i cant think of a better leader from the progressive ranks and ralph nader whose whole career has been cared arise by principled opposition to unchecked power, notably in recent years, it is easy to find people on the last criticizing Civil Liberties abuses during the bush administration. They got a lot more on the left during the obama administration. The ralph nader has raised the abuses has consolidate
Day or who owns the temple mount and he knows it. He does not believe he can negotiate these issues because you make the point that resonates why should we give up the west bank in return for something that is less that leaves these issues open and festering . So he goes to the un. That question you have to ask yourself a strategy for the palestinian issue that leaves the Democratic State state, what has to be the prime is really interest in a deal with the palestinians . Is it getting them to renounce the hard help position like right of return and the temple mount or is it getting it out of the west bank with Adequate Security provisions . If the latter i think it is possible with american help perhaps in the International Arena but maybe bilateral to make progress of a twostate solution to leave the heavy narrative issues like the temple mount 3,000 years old to leave them for the future that this is the only chance i see today. And frankly you have not been oriented in this directi
Havent understood that they are in this battle and youre not going to win a battle with much less a war if you dont know that you are in a war and so i think its very important for conservatives to understand the past, because if you dont understand the past, youre not going to know how to chart the future. We have had as a movement in my opinion our guns pointed at the wrong target. We have been focused on the democrats, pelosi, reid and obama and that has been a mistake because the opponent is inside the Republican Party. We are like those that had to wander through the desert for 40 years until the generation failed the flawed leaders that passed from the seat and we arent going to get the political promise land until we get new leaders. The American Voters do not agree with republican leaders. They dont like republicans. The media and the Big Government republicans have done a good job of blaming us conservatives, limited government conservatives, tea party for their losses but the
Integrating of the individual on the i. T. Side and the business side. Those are all three things that even right now at gsa three weeks ago implemented some of the things that we think will improve availability of providers to get access and work in that way. Thank you. Thank you, mr. Chairman. Thank you were senator hagen. Senator white house. Thank you, chairman. Welcome, ms. Burwell. In your summary of your very impressive career you describe yourself as having had the opportunity to lead large and complex organizations and work across a range of issues in each odds my role i worked on forming strong teams, forging relationships and delivering results. Has it been your experience that having solid clear performance metrics is an advantage. It is a an advantage to know where youre headed. Thats part of the accountability that you just described to senator hagen, correct . Yes. Knowing where youre headed and how youre going to measure whether you get there or not is important. Under