Advisory committee this is an action item. Good morning Committee Members this is on page 81 this is the project level c ac. The authority is leading project called the geneva feasibility study. It concerns a bus line on geneva and harry way connecting the station into San Mateo County connecting with the trans station and the new hunter point development. The line had been envisioned and the San Francisco admission transportation has been focused on the Infrastructure Improvements and making that service face and reliable. The study is a collaboration with the San Francisco agencies as well as the san mateo agencies concluding the Government Agency in San Francisco. The study escape includes a dedicated community to provide information on the community it will meet quarterly and it represents the at large community. 7 of those members will be appointed by the Community Board and two would be at large seats like pedestrians and bicyclists and the environment etc. And four of seats will
Test, test, test, test, test, test, test good morning, everyone the meeting will come to order. This is the tuesday july 18th of the transportation housing authority. Im erick im the chair of the committee and other supervisors. Able commissioner kim is on her way. Madam clerk can you call the role this is an action item. Thank you seeing no questions from my colleagues is there anyone from the public that would like to speak. Seeing none. Colleagues can we move this forward next item. Citizens advisory report that is an information item. And as always mr. Flanagan. Good morning commissioners my name is joseph im the c ac vice chair. There are 3 items on the agenda this morning the c ac took action on at our april meeting. We had 4 items on the june agenda that are on yourselves today. Items 4 and 6 were passed and that was unanimously by the c ac. Item 7 joint outreach strategy for the s f t p passed at the c ac by a vote of 9 to one. The c ac questioned the cost effects of outreach p
Supporting his nomination in september any other comments colleagues. So can we move mr. Marsh forward without objection thank you, mr. Marshall. Ms. Chang call the next item item 12 for the geneva Advisory Committee this is an action item. Good morning Committee Members this is on page 81 this is the project level c ac. The authority is leading project called the geneva feasibility study. It concerns a bus line on geneva and harry way connecting the station into San Mateo County connecting with the trans station and the new hunter point development. The line had been envisioned and the San Francisco admission transportation has been focused on the Infrastructure Improvements and making that service face and reliable. The study is a collaboration with the San Francisco agencies as well as the san mateo agencies concluding the Government Agency in San Francisco. The study escape includes a dedicated community to provide information on the community it will meet quarterly and it represen
Tonight and they appoint the seat and given the approval of this item theres an additional 8 seats that are due for new appointments and well bring that to the next meeting. For this application we have 3 applications found in our enclosure and a summary matrix. We know this is not mandatory ill conclude my presentation today to see if there are candidates who have come to speak please come forward. Thank you good morning commissioners im Richard Marshall thank you for your consideration of my application for the Advisory Committee in the downtown tenderloin seat. Ive been in the tenderloin and im an active bus recipient. I have been appointed by supervisor kim in the safety meetings. Its a great experience for me. Ive made basically decisions that i wanted to get further engaged in future projects and the committee he seems like the logical step. Although i have not had a chance to engage in the c ac meetings ive read most of the feasibility reports and i would be honored to advocate
Loma prieta was different. The ground acceleration here was quite moderate and the duration was moderate. So anyone that believes they survived a big earthquake and their building has been tested is sadly mistaken. We are planning for the bigger earthquake closer to San Francisco and a fault totally independent. Much stronger than the loma prieta earthquake. So people who were here in 89 they should say 3 times as strong and twice as long and that will give them more of an occasion of the earthquake we would have. 10 percent isnt really the threshold of damage. When you triple it you cross that line. Its much more damage in earthquake. I want to thank you, harvey, thanks pat for test, test, test, test, test, test, test, test good morning, everyone the meeting will come to order. This is the tuesday july 18th of the transportation housing authority. Im erick im the chair of the committee and other supervisors. Able commissioner kim is on her way. Madam clerk can you call the role this i