or being discreet. so many things wrong with him. the president hired him and touted his hiring and now trying to sort of rewrite history a little bit. he was not an integral member of the foreign policy leadership, certainly not, but he had a larger role than they re trying to admit now. he touted his abilities, it s on tape so it can t be denied or said that his words were twisted. do you think it s plausible that if papadopolous is this volunteer who s clearly ambitious, trying to make a name for himself in this campaign, that he would have had this information about the russians, but then kept it to himself and not told anyone in power within the campaign that could then capitalize on that information? it certainly is possible. this could have just been entirely idle bluster in a drunken meeting with a foreign diplomat. he could have been inebriated to make these wild claims early predicative. things happen like that in hindsight where we can put the