cold, the heat is on in iowa where candidates are making their final pitches before caucus-goers head out in what will be the coldest voting day in iowa caucus history. and the wicked weather not just hitting iowa, it s slamming the upper midwest as we speak heading east. it s already knocked out power for more than a quarter million americans and delayed thousands of flights. more on that storm coming up. but first, to the candidates far from hunkering down. and in the case of one vivek ramaswamy, picking up a surprising late endorsement. he s here to tell us all about it. and that run-in he had at a campaign event. and our hawkeye state-palooza doesn t end there. former governor terry branstad on why he s not endorsing, well, anyone. and iowa s longest serving senator, chuck grassley, on why he isn t either, at least not yet. bundle up. cavuto live is starting now. neil: welcome, everybody. i m neil cavuto. it is remarkable, i am not snowing you, it is uncanny how remar
you find some of these candidates doing it, and it s detail poll politics, and iowans take it very seriously as you can see the large number of people that show up at these rallies for the individual candidates. neil: how important is it to them? because you would think that candidates like vivek ramaswamy who, you know, has gone to every corner of the state, ron desantis says i visited all 99 counties, are they rewarded for doing that? how does that play into with this, the candidates who really put their heart and soul into this? whether you like them or not, they re there constantly. well, i suppose we know monday night who s rewarded and who isn t, and i think the reward doesn t come just exactly from the fact that people, some of the candidates are visiting every county for a, and and q&a with the candidates. but if you want to be taken seriously in iowa, paying attention to iowa s pretty darn
so whoever has a lead might see that lead dissipate as you go from, you know, one candidate to another if your candidate, i guess, doesn t get at least 15%. you have to jockey to another candidate. so you don t see these policy changing? no, i don t. and the 15 president threshold only applies 15% threshold only applies to the democrat system. in the republican caucus in iowa, people can vote for the candidate of their choice. it s a secret ballot. they come in, show their id, get signed in, and they get a chance to vote. so there s no second or third vote. neil: got it. let me ask you a little bit about the supreme court likely now at least going to hear the case of colorado s move to take donald trump off the ballot. it would extend to maine and, i guess, at least a dozen other states attorney generals. how do you think the impact will go? well, i think what happened there was election interference plain and simple. it has to be stopped. people have to be able to vote for the
and call facebook a disinformation for profit racket. this is going to present at some point not just reputational problems but regulatory problem s when some of these people get power and decide maybe we need to regulate facebook a little tighter if zuckerberg, himself, won t do it. it s baffling and inexplicable to me why you would put up with these kind of headaches for as mark pointed out such a small amount of profit. the risk/reward doesn t seem work it. mark, do you think they ll change change? i don t see why everybody else can be regulated, even us as a broadcast and they don t have to. i think they re going to take it to the well. i think their plan is they don t want any censorship, don t want any accountability and that s the design of the thing, that s why zuckerberg doubled down on it. no accountability. that s the way they got where they are and the way they want to go. sad. thank you, thank you, both. appreciate it. thanks. if you have moderate to severe psorias
problem and you ve had republicans working the refs. you ve now had joe biden come out, elizabeth warren come out and call facebook a disinformation for profit racket. this is going to present at some point not just reputational problems but regulatory problems when some of these people get power and decide maybe we need to regulate facebook a little tighter if zuckerberg, himself, won t do it. it s baffling and inexplicable to me why you would put up with these kind of headaches for as mark pointed out such a small amount of profit. the risk/reward doesn t seem work it. mark, do you think they ll change? i don t see why everybody else can be regulated, even us as a broadcast and they don t have to. i think they re going to take it to the well. i think their plan is they don t want any censorship, don t want any accountability and that s the design of the thing, that s why zuckerberg doubled down on it. no accountability. that s the way they got where they are and the way they want