hello. i m vishala sri pathma. world health experts say the advice on how much of an artificial sweetener we can consume remains unchanged. this is despite the sweetener, called aspartame, which is widely used in food and drink, being seen as possibly causing cancer. two groups of experts at the world health organization have been reviewing thousands of scientific studies, as our medical editor fergus walsh explains. aspartame is found in thousands of products. most commonly in sugar free drinks, but also some toothpaste, yoghurts and cough sweets. it is 200 times sweeter than sugar, so you get the sweet taste for a fraction of the calories. a who
out there that has has murdered four people and so we recognize that there is a fear in the public. we are trying to work through this. we are trying to complete and trying to advice the public where we are that way they are comfortable. christina: in the last update from moscow police which we got late yesterday, you know, they stated that the law enforcement, the fbi, they are reviewing thousands of tips, t t they are thousands of pieces of videos sent in the night of the attack on november 13th, still no arrests in this case. mike. mike: let s hope and pray they get a break and arrest the killer or killers. christina coleman live on the ground in moscow. thank you very much. ukraine is bracing for several more massive missile strikes from russia as the temperature continues to drop. a live report from kyiv next.
information they were seeing before january 6th and why the national guard took so long to respond after rioters overran the capitol. they have developed significant new information after reviewing thousands of pages of documents and conducting more than 100 interviews. congressional records are not subject to the freedom of information act. if the committee doesn t publish those findings they may never see the light of day. legal experts said that would be a huge missed opportunity. why would that be? why would they not at least release it? again, we re told that some members, particularly liz cheney, believe that it becomes a talking point for donald trump if there are security failures. and it has been already. it becomes an excuse and a way to take culpability away from the people who attacked the capitol. after 9/11 nobody made that point about the fbi and cia.
he will likely snub the committee as steve bannon has, as navarro has, as mark meadows has. frank, i welcome you to weigh in on that, but also how the committee conduct secret service witnesses after reviewing thousands of their conversations, how significant is that, is that particular threat in this investigation? you know, nbc news has previously reported that the committee has gotten their hands on literally over 1 million communications from the entire secret service, no matter where you are assigned. if you communicated internally on january 5th or january 6th, the committee has your communication. what does that mean? it means there could be some real revelations, about not only what went on in the detail around the vice president and around the president, but also back at secret service headquarters, who knew what when? who was saying we are in over our heads, we need to pull out
at a crossroads where it had no choice but to get to him because only trump could speak to some lingering questions they had. there was immediately a sense that the subpoena may have more symbolic value. that being said, president trump former president trump, i should say, no surprise, maybe he ll come up with something, but if the past is any guide, the conduct of his political allies is any guide, he is going to likely snuff the committee, as steve bannon has, as peter navarro has, as mark meadows has. frank, i want you to weigh in on that, but i asked to ask you after reviewing thousands of their conversations. how significant is that particular threat in this investigation? nbc news has previously reported that the committee has got their hands on literally over 1 million communications