shield. there also appear to be at least two rifles there. that picture was taken at 11:52 a.m. that s just 19 minutes after the gunman first entered the school. and 58 minutes before officers took him down. now, there s another picture obtained by the texas tribune this time that shows multiple officers armed with rifles there. ballistic shields, multiple shields. and axe-like tools. most of which the tribune reports were never deployed. now, we must note, we do not know at what point in the standoff this image was taken. but it does seem by these images that police were well equipped to storm the gunman. and this is raising new questions and understandably new anger about the police response by uvalde officers. we re also learning that some officers on the scene questioned the plan, as confusion delayed the breaching of the classrooms with kids still inside. rosa flores is live in san antonio this morning. rosa, with the new images that really just delve further in to w
DUBLIN (BUSINESS WIRE) The "Rehabilitation Equipment Market by Product (Medical Bed, Mobility Scooter, Walker, Crutcher, Cane, Patient Lift, Sling), Application (Physical, OT, Lower-body Exercise Equipment), End User (Rehabilitation & Physiotherapy Center) - Global Forecast to 2027" report has been added to Resear.
Daniel Haeberli and Stefan Kramer of Homburger consider why the first bond issued by a Swiss car leasing company is the next logical step in the evolution of Swiss structured covered bonds
have not even applied, and that, the committee concludes, is because they are fearful of the home office. as one windrush victim told me today, it s as though the offender, the home office in this case, is also thejudge and jury and home office in this case, is also the judge and jury and for a lot of people who have been deeply affected by what happened to them as a result of the windrush scandal, they simply don t trust the home office, so the mps would like to see an independent body, perhapsjudge led, reviewing body, perhaps judge led, reviewing each body, perhapsjudge led, reviewing each of those cases. the home office has said that they don t think it s a good idea because it would risk significantly delaying vital payments to those affected and the delays are already substantial, of course, and the home office goes on to say that they have already made significant improvements to the scheme and have paid out £31.6 million with a further 5.6 million having been offered. neverthe
All too often, police and other government agencies unleash invasive surveillance technologies on the streets of our communities, based on the unilateral and secret decisions of agency executives, after hearing from no one except corporate sales agents. This spy tech causes false arrests, disparately burdens BIPOC and immigrants, invades our privacy, and deters our free speech.
Many communities have found Community Control of Police Surveillance (CCOPS) laws to be an effective step on the path to systemic change. CCOPS laws empower the people of a community, through their legislators, to decide whether or not city agencies may acquire or use surveillance technology. Communities can say “no,” full stop. That will often be the best answer, given the threats posed by many of these technologies, such as face surveillance or predictive policing. If the community chooses to say “yes,” CCOPS laws require the adoption of use policies that secure civil rights and civil liberties, and