nominee will advance to the full vote in the senate and it won t matter ultimately showing a full vote in the senate. as we know all the democrats will vote for her and she s got the extra republican vote from susan collins. by all accounts, that won t matter ultimately. todd: keisha you looked at the reversal rate over time and decisions reversed on appeal. what did you find? we found her reversal rate was somewhere about 11%. and we found that in her time as district court judge, she was reversed by d.c. court of appeals and what is really astonishing about that is the majority of the judges in the district court of appeals are democrats and so the democrats with her opinions went too far where ultimately abuse of discretion. you said we can t expect critical race theorist to send
in the constitution because the constitution is not worth defending. some explain to us how this can be damaging not only damaging but it can be concerning for someone sitting in the highest court. well, ultimately the judge needs to lead in the founding documents and needs to understand the original meanings of the document will keep fundamental rights alive. if you have someone on the supreme court that doesn t trust those documents and ultimately does not think they are worth defending, they will not adhere to the text of the documents appear they will come up with their own interpretation and vote in a way that is in line with ideological views and not in line with the constitution. todd: in all the areas that are most concerning to you, which ones stand out? well, i think certainly the reversal rate is a problem here and i think her unwillingness, that is to define you judicial
The European Central Bank (ECB) is the central bank of the 19 European Union countries which have adopted the euro. Our main task is to maintain price stability in the euro area and so preserve the purchasing power of the single currency.
court, and if those numbers look high, it s because once a case is kicked to the supreme court there s a chance it will be overturned. they are close calls and they may have to be reversed, otherwise why is the supreme court going to get involved in it. the only way to look at a circuit to see if something is out of whack, how many total cases get reversed not how many that the supreme court plucked out of their docket to look at. fewer than 1% of the cases they handle get reversed. when they get up to the supreme court the circuit variously is listed as number three or four in the reversal rate, and other circuits i thought the funniest thing about it not really funny but ohio, the ohio circuit, one beloved by the president, is the most reversed
in an official statement he said, quote, we do not have obama judges or trump judges, bush judges or clinton judges, what we have is an extraordinary group of dedicated judges doing their level best to do equal right to those appearing before them. that independent judiciary is something we should all be thankful for. again, it is remarkable that a chief justice had to feel like he needs to issue such a response. he knew it would get under the president s skin, and it did. after golfing the president wrote in part, sorry, chief justice john roberts, but you do, indeed, have obama judges. why are a vast number of those cases overturned? please study the numbers. they are shocking. he goes on to quote fox news saying 79% of these decisions have been overturned in the ninth circuit. keeping them honest despite what the president and fox news want to claim, there are other circuits with a higher reversal rate than the ninth circuit and theirs is only a little higher than average. also, the