revenue, no revenue whatsoever, any sort of closing loopholes or any tax breaks is off the table. that s a recipe for dysfunction. we re saying and we will actually produce a budget to say it more con krocretely that wil needs to be a balanced approach. and we re willing to talk. if we close the loophole, if we cut responsibly, not across the board. for example, cutting special operations, special forces in the military, cutting submarines, cutting tri care which is the health care plan, $3 billion, that kind of cut along with nutrition, health care, the country just won t go for it. and it impacts employment. i keep coming back to the economy because we have to keep our eye on that ball. job creation, economic growth, there is common ground. would the senate have even produced a budget if the house hadn t forced you to do it, if the house republicans didn t say you have to do a budget or we
significantly cut deficit and debt. the biggest deficit package we have seen in a very long time and it is accomplished without raising individual tax rates. it s accomplished in a way compatible with the no-tax pledge that a bunch of folks signed on to, because we were mindful they boxed themselves in. we tried to find a way for them to generate revenues in a way that dead not put them in a bad spot that did not put them in a bad spot. so the question is what can you say yes to? if their only answer is what they have presented which is a package that effectively would require massive cuts to social security, to medicare and domestic spending, with no revenue whatsoever, not asking anything from the wealthiest or corporations that make
it would be the biggest deficit package we have seen in a very long time. and it s accomplished without raising individual tax rates. it s accomplished in a way that s compatible with the no-tax pledge that a bunch of these folks signed on to because we were mindful that they boxed themselves in. and we tried it find ways to generate revenues in a way that did not put them in a bad spot. so the question is, what can you say yes to? now if their only answer is what they ve presented, which is a package that would effectively require massive cuts to social security, medicare, domestic spending, with no revenue whatsoever, not asking anything from the wealthiest in this country or corporations that
package we have seen in a very long time. and it s accomplished without raising individual tax rates. it s accomplished in a way that s compatible with the no-tax pledge that a bunch of these folks signed on to because we were mindful that they boxed themselves in. and we tried it find ways to generate revenues in a way that did not put them in a bad spot. so the question is, what can you say yes to? now if their only answer is what they ve presented, which is a package that would effectively require massive cuts to social security, medicare, domestic spending, with no revenue whatsoever, not asking anything from the wealthiest in this country or corporations that have been making record profits,
significantly cut deficit and debt. the biggest deficit package we have seen in a very long time and it is accomplished without raising individual tax rates. it s accomplished in a way compatible with the no-tax pledge that a bunch of folks signed on to, because we were mindful they boxed themselves in. we tried to find a way for them to generate revenues in a way that dead not put them in a bad spot that did not put them in a bad spot. so the question is what can you say yes to? if their only answer is what they have presented which is a package that effectively would require massive cuts to social security, to medicare and domestic spending, with no revenue whatsoever, not asking anything from the wealthiest