and he s busy tweeting about obstructionist, rather than telling voters what they re going to get. david: i want a pure economist back in here. john tamny, don t you think the economy would boom if we had serious tax cuts? of course it would boom, but i also think that misses the point. look, the fact if you lower the i think a lot of people want the boom. that s the only point that most people are interested in. and if you say to reduce the investment and republicans have to get back to first principles. free people, naturally growth, growth is the easy part. cut taxes period and get revenue stuff out of the picture. it presumes that we have a revenue problem. john makes a good point and when he uses certain words, i get lost. the bottom line, it s not rocket science. you cut the costs of doing business and you ll get more
these issues, because the issue of compensating college football players, schools 300 universities who have football can t afford to do this. but 65 of them might be able to afford it. right. and they actually decided not to go with the sub-association, because they realize that would probably be unwise as they re fighting an antitrust lawsuit to further delineate themselves along revenue lines. and this is you talk about the revenue stuff, it ties into the antitrust suit, as well. they do not want these guys to be considered employees, because if they re considered employees, well, they ve got a 400-page rule book that explains how they re fixing the price on that particular labor market. so it s a big deal to the ncaa to make sure these guys are not considered employees. remember, the term student-athlete goes back to the 50s. it was essentially a workers compensation dodge. they were trying to get out of paying workers compensation for injured athletes. an invention by wal