A gauge a counter that would show the amount of transportation revenue that we expect to have through 2040. The participant would make choices about how to invest that revenue in operations and maintenance, street maintenance, walking, biking, signals, capital expansion projects. The participant could choose whether or not they wanted to add additional revenue, raise taxes or fees in some way, have additional revenue to their budget and they could see what additional investment could be afforded if they made that choice. This is a summary other groups that we reached. I would note that we did ask for volunteer information about participants zip codes, and incoming demographic information. Only about 55 percent of the participants actually gave us that. What you are seeing here is a map of the 55 percent of the participants who did give their zip code noting about 15 percent of the respondents were not San Francisco residents or indicated they were not San Francisco residents. These wer
The purpose of that was to get feedback from the public and to educate the public and stakeholders about transportation needs, available revenues and also to get feedback on what the publics interest would be in transportation investment under a socalled mission scenario. If there were more revenues in the future than we expected to have. One of the key tools that we used during this outreach was a budget tzar game, where participants could create their own longrange plan. Got a great response. These are the mechanisms that we used to get the word out about the budget game and about the Transportation Plan update in general. We had discussions about priorities, investment priorities, tradeoffs, revenues, and where we have shortfalls in other venues besides the online budget games. We went to Community Events in every district. We went to over 18 Community Groups and boards and commissions and had this conversation. It wasnt just the budget game. That we used to get this input. The budg
Good morning and welcome to the San Francisco this petition authority. I want to welcome commissioner london bree for the First Commission meeting. Welcome and congratulations on being here. Our clerk is erica chang is sfgt are charles and mark. I believe that satisfies our first item roll call. Second item . To approve the minutes of the december 4, 2012 meeting. It is an action item. Any comments . Public comment . Any member of the public would like to comment on item 2 . Will close of the comment. Colleagues can we have a motion to approve the minutes . So moved. Second by supervisor cohen. Next item. Item 3 Citizens Advisory Committee report. An information item. Good morning. Good morning. I have a report. I have a quick report from the december 5 meeting of the cac. At this time we have reviewed and passed action items 5 through 9 from the december 4 plans and programs agenda. The first cac meeting of 2013 will be on wednesday, jan. 23rd. At this meeting we will vote for the cha
gavel before we enter a emotion to convene in closed sessions, is there any member that wants to make a comment . Seeing none. At this time we asked members of the public to please exit the room during the close session the committee voted to forward item 611 the full board with recommendations. Thank you cannot entertain the motion to close to close session. We can do that without opposition. Anything else on the agenda . No madam chair. Seeing none, meeting is adjourned. Good morning and welcome to the San Francisco this petition authority. I want to welcome commissioner london bree for the First Commission meeting. Welcome and congratulations on being here. Our clerk is erica chang is sfgt are charles and mark. I believe that satisfies our first item roll call. Second item . To approve the minutes of the december 4, 2012 meeting. It is an action item. Any comments . Public comment . Any member of the public would like to comment on item 2 . Will close of the comment. Colleagues can
Commissions and had this conversation. It wasnt just the budget game. That we used to get this input. The budget game turned out to be very popular though; we had over 800 submittals. Also submittals in spanish and chinese as well. The premise of this game was a participant would go to the site and would have a gauge a counter that would show the amount of transportation revenue that we expect to have through 2040. The participant would make choices about how to invest that revenue in operations and maintenance, street maintenance, walking, biking, signals, capital expansion projects. The participant could choose whether or not they wanted to add additional revenue, raise taxes or fees in some way, have additional revenue to their budget and they could see what additional investment could be afforded if they made that choice. This is a summary other groups that we reached. I would note that we did ask for volunteer information about participants zip codes, and incoming demographic info