might involve other things. that seems, if true, to be a way to get there, and to get there soon. i think kyrsten sinema has hurt herself by not talking about what she is for. i understand she believes strongly negotiations should occur in private, and she will fully explain her vote when she makes her vote, and it will become a parents but she works for and cares about. in the interim, the vacuum is being filled by a lot of anger towards her. i ve been on the phone all day, lawrence, as you might imagine, was a bunch of different senators in my party. i am confident the politico reporting is correct. that she has, in fact, to agree to a number of revenue enhancers in various ways that
way to get there and to get there soon. yeah, i think kyrsten sinema has really hurt herself by not talking about what she s for. i understand that she believes very strongly that negotiations should occur in private and that she will fully explain her vote when she makes her vote, and it will become apparent what she worked for and what she cares about. but in the interim, the vacuum is being filled by a lot of anger towards her. i ve been on the phone all day, lawrence, as you might imagine with a bunch of different senators in my party. i am confident that the politico reporting is correct, that she has, in fact, agreed to a number of revenue enhancers in various ways that will make this
communities by bad policies that put 12 million people out of work, compared to what happened when regulagan took a different viewpoint. reagan reduced them and created jobs and opportunities. w big difference between the reagan recovery and the obama recovery. reagan did it by crushing inflation which is not a problem obama had. and balancing the soviet union. is a lot more difficult, period, that he had, than obama ef picked up on. twice the growth, 4%, not 2%. david, this is grover, right? first of all, reagan had a cooperative congress. we have republicans who, the very night of the inauguration got together and said, we re going to make sure this man fails as a republican. reagan imposed they called them revenue enhancers that
let me turn that around. we have fine votes in the united states and to repeal the medical device tax and not delay, 79 senators, republicans and democrats voted to repeal the tax. it is not going to work. it is not popular. where do you get the money you lose on the medical device tax? there a number of revenue enhancers and papers that can come out of the budget exitee. that s not a problem. the problem is that there seems to be giving anything on obama care even something 79 senators have voted for on a test basis. do you understand why democrats think why should they give into anything for something that is temporary and wait to negotiate on a larger deal?
i m encouraged and that puts the burden on us to do the same thing, i think we will. robert, your reaction to that, is the burden on the republicans now, will they compromise? i think that kind of speaks from my earlier point. i think so and here s the reason why, republicans don t want to be seen as the party of obstruction and as the party of no. the president according to the polling data people see him as reasonable, people see him as thoughtful, most people see him as backwards when it comes to the economy. most people see him a little more with his head in the sand. i think republicans will compromise a little bit. the question becomes if it s revenue enhancers as opposed to tax increases, but i think they will come to the center just a little bit. dana, do you think that if republicans don t begin to compromise, do you think they ll continue with the moniker, being the party of no? they will indeed, and rob s got it right for that reason, we all know what the ultimate