18 years actually fits the crime. one of my friend s fathers when i was talking about this case to him said the way to avoid this happening is don t send people nude pictures of yourself over the internet. there s that of course yes. but you have california, you mentioned other states with these revenge porn laws. do you think there s a precedent being set here now? well like i said i don t know if there s going to be particularly a precedent. certainly there s going to be people that are going to listen up now that this gentleman got sentenced to 18 years. congress and the government? i definitely think there s going to be some sort of federal act that s going to come around and it would be necessary to clean up all the states that have these laws that are very poorly written. the government really needs to write a different kind of law that kind of is all-encompassing in this kind of area. and it affects state lines, it affects commerce so you d think the federal government w
she was trusting you. could happen to me had she trusted. now, even though i m destroying her life. even though she has gone on and gotten married and became a senator or congresswoman or wife of some prominent person she could up until very recently do nothing then california and new jersey passed these revenge porn laws that make it a crime for me to post those photos of you with malicious intent to destroy your reputation. let me stop you. but this guy, he didn t post them of anybody he knew. he just allowed people to post them on his web site. right? and that s why this is a unique and landmark case, because, up until now, the web sites have been in the clear. that s right. the third party web sites because of the lobbying clouds of google and fain and twitter and all the rest of them, there is no third party liability. they can get the google and the facebook ironically if they violate copy rights but not for posting pictures, however nude pictures, however. or defa
it appeared on an anonymous twitter account along with a lewd text message. the washington post stated an anonymous woman shared with them other images and videos barton sent her years prior and played a video of a phone conversation. he warns her against using the materials. barton himself said a transcript of the recording may be evidence of a potential crime against him. one legal observer explains. listen. let s say he shares this with a person. if that person provided that image unedited to a third person who then posted it on the internet, that act of sharing that image unedited would constitute a violation of the texas revenge porn laws.