he also thinks about his two daughters, whose lives their graduations, triumphs, marriages, children he will never witness. two girls who at the ages of 18 and 14 back then suddenly found themselves left without either parent in the home. because of a final twist to this story of the trail of retributi retribution. rob s wife candy was sent to prison herself. because of the killing? no. she pleaded guilty to charges of grand theft for embezzling some $30,000 from the attorney for whom she worked before emmitt corrigan. she served 18 months for that. she s on parole now. before she went to prison, she talked to us about regret. i have a lot of guilt still in me. a lot. and it has to do with my kids and his kids. and it makes me sick how i could
i am not talking about impeachment here. i am talking about potentially putting in danger of retribution, people who are working in this white house and he seems to be ready to leave the charge to do that. you think he should do that? i think lindsey is going to do what he thinks is correct. you think he thinks it is right to put people in jeopardy in retributi retribution? lindsey is going to get reelected. that s all he cares about. are you saying his principle is if you come forward with information that the president of the united states committed a crime that you should have retribution be outed, that s his principles? that would be quite disturbing. he s trying to get to the bottom of where it came from. don t those people have the
and yelling at united states senators by writing a speech for the first ten minute where is he talks about, i m so qualified, i went to yale, i worked so hard. none of that would negate the fact that he could have still engaged in a sexual assault. it took 10 or 15 minutes before he even mentioned the victim. and to me, when it comes to the supreme court, and this is hurting the institution of the supreme court. this feels also very political to me, that he s now justices don t write op-eds. they sit and they don t speak other than through their opinions. i m troubled by so many parts of this. but this to me does not make it better. it s interesting, because when you read it, and i encourage people to read it, he says he regrets some of the things he says, he went too far. he doesn t go into details. but in that opening statement, he was talking about a conspiracy, in part, hatched by the clintons and this was retributi retribution. does what he say now, does that,
sales to iran and unlawfully continuing the war in nicaragua, the president was spared retributi retribution. but if reagan was not to be held accountable, who would be? there are about 13 charges of obstruction of investigation and false statements. the task fell to an independent counsel. lawrence walsh brought charges against caspar weinberger, bud mcfarland, john poindexter, oliver north, richard seacord and nine others. fawn hall was not charged. nobody really believes that these people intended to be criminals. it just, it reeks with politics. i just have to believe that they re going to be found innocent, because i don t think they were guilty of any lawbreaking or any crime. the court of law disagreed. nearly four years after beginning his investigation, the
and today is a day of retributi retribution. targeting the army and the positions were attacked in neighboring northern iraq. reports of more than 100 pro-kurdish political activists rounded up in raids country wide. this is the issue. this is what you were stating. rightly so. saturday s attack in istanbul was the 17th major terrorist attack by either kurdish militants or isis in turkey this past year alone. then you have the political instability and polarization brought by the failed coup in the summer. it would not be an understatement to suggest this is one of the tumultuous years in modern history.