Studies cited in case over abortion pill are retracted due to flaws and conflicts of interest startribune.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from startribune.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Journal publisher retracts studies used by Texas judge who ruled to suspend use of abortion pill localnews8.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from localnews8.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
A medical journal has retracted two studies claiming to show the harms of the abortion pill mifepristone, citing conflicts of interest by the authors and flaws in their research. Two of the three studies retracted by medical publisher Sage Perspectives were cited in a pivotal Texas court ruling that has threatened access to the pill. […]
Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk ruled against distribution of the abortion pill mifepristone. A medical journal has now retracted studies he cited in his decision.
In another example of questionable research, two papers about cancer detection were retracted in 2022 because the senior scientist listed — at UW-Madison — apparently doesn’t exist.