The selection of a new Lake Superior Court judge is likely to continue without interruption after a lawsuit challenging the appointment process was revised to no longer apply to the
that to me this is so unoriginal. i grew up with the court but they act like it s a brand-new idea to attack the supreme court, a fresh new notion. trashing the court is what is going on since roosevelt didn t like the court, he tried to pack it and conservatives didn t like it because brown case and the rest of it, they didn t like the prayer in school case, so they trashed it. didn t lincoln try to make it 13 people or something like that? it goes way back. so boring. it s going to be a huge issue. let s play with this idea of cruz . he s a lawyer, went to harvard law, brilliant guy. former general of the state. how did he think would work every eight years would have a retention election? the supreme court justice would have campaign and have advertising and the people that didn t like it would run
let s play with this idea of cruz . he s a lawyer, went to harvard law, brilliant guy. former general of the state. how did he think would work every eight years would have a retention election? the supreme court justice would have campaign and have advertising and the people that didn t like it would run advertising campaigns against it. is this an improvement? how can you think more elections, more money, more poll litization, would they join political parties. what about the justice who doesn t have any money? he doesn t actually think this, chris. of course, he doesn t think this. this is something that sounds good, good read meat for his crowd and as a matter of fact, if we had something like that on at least on the question of same-sex marriage in most jurisdictions, the judges