in very different ways. some people will be extremely angry. some people are going to be delighted. bu delightet we now have to dealt. with the merits of thisd indictmentth and the serious constitutional questions that are raised when you criminalize challenges to elections. what s missing in this indictment is any limiting principle of how we distinguish between challenges. you knownges., had people like jamie raskin try to oppose the certificatiortificatn, donat trump in 2016. there were violent riots after election. nobody is suggesting that was a crime and it shouldn t. you would. marc elias, hillary clinton s general counse elias, y clintolr tried to overturn an election in new york alleging that the machines had somehow flipped the resultg no. one said that was a crime because it wasn t a crime. soha question is, where is that? limiting principle here? and i don t se e it. and i think that we re goinge it to see in the coming weeks