Creek. And importantly, we are thinking that our recommendation today, is that leasing historic piers for more than 35 years, without a Sea Level Rise strategy is no longer advisable. So, this is the last of our recommendations, and it really goes to what we suggest for planning Going Forward. We think that in order to balance state and local interests, in the water front, where there is planning Going Forward, we need to invite bcdc and the state lands to participate in the process. Much in the way that we are seeing with the bcdc port working group. Given our recommendation that we do the subarea planning and the discreet areas of the water front, rather than the whole water front as was the case with the adoption of the water front land use, and there is a lot of efforts in the projects that are under way and those projects need to continue while the planning discussions occur and looking at the discreet water front subareas, we have planning under way in both the fixer mans wharf a
There has been broad acceptance, of the projects that have been built, and some neighborhoods have had problems, with height. And particularly in the northern water front and other neighborhoods have welcomed the height and the water mark is example in the south beach neighborhood, and as we moved forward. In terms of looking in terms of prop b with we need to open the die long and how to formulate, the proposals that do need to go to the vote and hers what does that process look like in the future and also, we were moving away. And particularly on the west side of the embarcadaro and there has been a lot of attention to the resilientcy and the adaptation planning and our major neighborhood scale project at 337 and pier 70 do address the Sea Level Rise through 2100 and the fort and the sister city agencies are undertaking the Planning Efforts right now to look at seismic risk to the sea wall and to address the Sea Level Rise in places like mission creek. And importantly, we are thinkin
Tenants that provide the materials to one another. And in a way that he minimizes the truck trips in the area. And then, norical invested about 30 Million Dollars, in pier 96 to create the recycle central. And so, we have seen over 300 Million Dollars invested just through the real estate projects alone. There is an increasing focus on sustainability and environmental improvement along the port, and each of the ports divisions have profession alien vier mental staff who lead these projects. And we have installed two short Power Systems to reduce the emissions from the cruise ships, and from our ship repair operations at pier 70 and over 8 acres have been removed from the San Francisco pay and the projects managed by the Port Engineering Division and the Planning Group manages the programs that involve, thousands of hours of volunteers, at pier 94. And we have worked to try to bring our under pier utilities up to snuff. And so the report, in addition to surveying all of these projects a
And then, norical invested about 30 Million Dollars, in pier 96 to create the recycle central. And so, we have seen over 300 Million Dollars invested just through the real estate projects alone. There is an increasing focus on sustainability and environmental improvement along the port, and each of the ports divisions have profession alien vier mental staff who lead these projects. And we have installed two short Power Systems to reduce the emissions from the cruise ships, and from our ship repair operations at pier 70 and over 8 acres have been removed from the San Francisco pay and the projects managed by the Port Engineering Division and the Planning Group manages the programs that involve, thousands of hours of volunteers, at pier 94. And we have worked to try to bring our under pier utilities up to snuff. And so the report, in addition to surveying all of these projects and looking at the total amount invested pursuant to the water front plan, makes some preliminary recommendation
Address the Sea Level Rise through 2100 and the fort and the sister city agencies are undertaking the Planning Efforts right now to look at seismic risk to the sea wall and to address the Sea Level Rise in places like mission creek. And importantly, we are thinking that our recommendation today, is that leasing historic piers for more than 35 years, without a Sea Level Rise strategy is no longer advisable. So, this is the last of our recommendations, and it really goes to what we suggest for planning Going Forward. We think that in order to balance state and local interests, in the water front, where there is planning Going Forward, we need to invite bcdc and the state lands to participate in the process. Much in the way that we are seeing with the bcdc port working group. Given our recommendation that we do the subarea planning and the discreet areas of the water front, rather than the whole water front as was the case with the adoption of the water front land use, and there is a lot