very much. so much to discuss. let s bring in the right person to talk to on the trump side, donald trump s campaign manager kellyanne conway. good to see you my friend. we see the polls moving closer. especially battleground states. why? especially in blue states, also. donald trump s closing with a positive message. talking about his love for the country, his love for the people. what he s going to do to help them solve everyday problems. hillary clinton is going lower and lower. going totally negative. people don t like that. they feel like they deserve and should be respected to have a substantive conversation. to this is a contrast of two campaigns. particularly in these closing arguments. hillary clinton and even the president and vice president of the united states are talking about donald trump and donald trump is talking about the american people. i think that s the difference. i hear him doing two things. bashing clinton about the e-mails. bashing obamacare. and both of
best messenger of that. pitter-patter has a bit of a dismissive attitude. i want to say one thing about the ben carson campaign response which is we see this again and again in this campaign. we saw it from donald trump on carly fiorina s face where candidates or their campaigns say what you just heard the candidate say, he didn t say. we can t let them get away with that. because we heard what dr. carson said. it s not what his campaign now says he said. another point was what trump said i believe on abc to stephanopoulos about how it gives him a headache to listen to carly fiorina. what is that resonant of? i don t know. what do you think? exactly. the vapors. i think women all over america, just to paraphrase. thank you very much, ruth, kristen and of course, our friend chris cillizza. as joe biden s travels keep the speculation going about whether or not he s going to jump into the race, biden has
trump went after john mccain s war record the rnc say inging there s no place in the party or the country for somebody to make comments like that. let s talk about trump s trips to the border. what can we expect when he lands? we expect him to land just about an hour from now. reporter: besides a lot of wind we can expect he s going to come here and he is going to actually you know try to turn the conversation back to where he wants it jake and where he wants it is on his position on illegal immigration. he is very fond of saying he inserted that topic back into the conversation within the republican primary nominating process to the point where a lot of republicans aren t comfortable which is why we had that whole conversation about a third-party run. he believes this is where he is most resonant with a lot of members of the republican party. those who are looking for somebody to continue the conversation about being tough on illegal immigration.
american history. a clear and resonant and easy to understand the court. the limitation of marriage to open sits sex couples may long have seemed natural and just but it s inconsistency with the meaning ofight to marry is manifest. with that knowledge the recognition that laws excludeing same sex couples from the marriage rite impose stigma and injury of the kind prohibited by our basic charter. especially against the long history of disapproval of their relationships. the denial to same-sex couples of the right to marry works a grave and continuing harm. it s all from the ruling. if you want to know the part of this that you will hear at weddings from now until the end of your life if you want to know the part that will be written out again and again as almost practice of what it means to articulate american justice and american progress in your lifetime, this is it. this is the part that you will
today, one of the most sweeping civil rights rulings in american history, certainly the biggest gay rights ruling ever in american history, a clear and resonant and easy-to-understand blunt declaration by the majority of the court. the limitation of marriage to opposite-sex couples may long have seemed natural and just but its inconsistency with the central meaning of the fundamental right to marry is now manifest. with that knowledge must come the recognition that laws excluding same-sex couples from the marriage right impose stigma and injury of the kind prohibited by our basic charter. especially against a long history of disapproval of their relationships. the denial to same-sex couples of the right to marry works a grave and continuing harm.