likes to embarrass people, he s embarrassing people. let me tell you what he s doing, what he s doing by filing this action is now the president in responding to it, now you re in litigation, so are we going to go to depositions where we ll find out where the source of the money came from, was it sanctioned by the president? what money am i speaking about? the hush money we re talking about. you and michael cohen alone on your own accord paid this money out of a home equity line did the president have anything to do with it? was it sanctioned by him? in the event you get into that now you get into campaign finance, potential violations, now you get into the department of justice issues, now you get into depositions where you give sworn testimony under oath which could be false and now you get into legal traps. what the president needs to do is just settle the case, resolve it, he won t and this will cause him major headaches and problems of a legal dimension that equate with bob muelle
make it illegal to go there to visit. a settlement means any building. take, for example, the jewish quarter of jerusalem. the jordanians captured it during a genocide war against israel in 1948. the israelites recaptured in 1987. but no state recognizes that. no state recognizes that. that s up for negotiation, but the u.n. should declare t. jerusalem has always been under negotiation for a two-party. that s right, but the u.n. shouldn t resolve it. it should be up for negotiation. if there is no land to offer, if the u.n. has already said this is illegal when it s subject to negotiation, it has concluded what should be concluded only
shots were from the front, and the shots were frontal, and the trajectory, and indication of some type of struggle, and the question is then becoming is the officer reasonable fear of his life that he needed to act in a deadly way and that is is going to address the lawsuit if they have a suit, but from the look of the tape, it seems that the officer acted in accord to with what he should do in that suchation. and in respect, but i am not a lawyer, but it is not your right to refuse to turn over the driver s license at the window. assert your rights later. and if you don t like the way you were treated, go to court, and let the lawyer resolve it, but the case is going to turn on what happened outside of that car and was the officer in imminent fear of his life such that he needed to fire, and if the question is yes, then the case will will go away. and all of us is diskconcertd
devin is not at fault or that devin s actions may not have led to the conclusion that the officer fired justifiably? well, from our perspective, it is quite clear i think that watching the video that the police aofficer escalated the encounter throughout, throughout that short period of time. initially, devin, as you can see, he just thought that he was doing something helpful and being a good citizen and instead of that being recognized, he is being argued with and berated and probably in his view being treated like a criminal. he is a young man obviously, 17. i hear what you are saying, but i do take ir issue with the police being the party that escalated it, because when i watched it in the entirety that officer asked seven times for
[ crowd saying justice for tamir. ] for this i want to bring in analyst joey jackson and this is a heartbreaking case, and no matter how you look at it, it was a 12-year-old kid who was not menacing anyone and he had an air soft gun, and if you are looking at it from the family, it is a tragedy unanswered, but if you look at it from the police officers, they make a split second decision, and they were not armed with information that he is a youngster and looked apparently much older one of the witnesses said and they were not told about the fake gun, but i can feel for samaria rice 11 months later. it is a mother who has lost a child and the community wants the grand jury to evaluate the case and make their decisions, and there a feeling, and there s a feeling, and the feeling