vladimir putin a war criminal. and yet you have called for negotiations with him. will it be hard? will it be painful for you to have to sit down with putin were he to agree and negotiate with him? i am ready for negotiations with him. i was ready over the last two years, and i think that i think that without negotiations, we cannot end this war. i think that all the people who think that this dialogue is shallow and that it is not going resolve anything, they just don t understand that this is very valuable. if there is just 1% chance for us to stop this war, i think that we need to take this
and i think that without negotiations we cannot end this war. i think that all of the people who are think this dialogue is shallow and not going resolve anything, they just don t understand this is very valuable. there is just one percent chance for us to stop the war, i think that we need to take this chance. we need to do that. i can tell you about the reresult of this negotiation. in any case, we re losing people on daily basis. innocent people. on the ground. russian forces have come to exterminate us and kill us. and we give dignity of our people and army. we are able to deal a powerful
churchill, and one of the more dramatic moments. get your popcorn out. one conservative party member stood up and literally walked across the aisle and joined the liberal democrat party. that defection cost the conservative party its majority in parliament. so richard, first of all, high drama in the house of commons, but what do you think about, you think calling of the new election is just an idle threat from boris johnson? well, parliament has to approve a call for a new election. it s unlikely he ll get support for 2/3, i think it is. that s not going to happen, so it s quite possible that we re just going to have drift. we won t have a no deal brexit. my guess is we ll have drift for a while, and it won t resolve anything. there s the tragedy of the brexit vote, you don t conduct foreign policy by referendum,
administration of justice so requires. so, two different reports, but most importantly, these are only about mueller. this is in his investigation, which is a very limited one into russia counterintelligence and then obstruction of justice, the firing of comey. it doesn t have to do with the southern district investigation, the trump foundation, the other things congress is looking into and the like. so that s all separate. so we should just, as we talk about the mueller investigation, remember that s just one piece of a much larger inquiry. neal, do you believe a brief summary is in the president s best interest? i don t. i actually think that if it is a brief summary, it actually could be counterproductive to the president, because it won t resolve anything. and i think, you know, the investigation now is really like the internet, with multiple different nodes. you ve got congress, you ve got the southern district of new york, you have the new york attorney general, the state att
brief summary, it actually could be counterproductive to the president because it won t resolve anything, and i think, you know, the investigation now is really like the internet with multiple different nodes. you have congress, you ve got the southern district of new york. you have the new york attorney general, the state attorney general, possibly other investigators as well just because of the rampant amount of allegations here, which are obviously of deep concern to the american people. and trump, who has been attacking mueller for two years, hasn t really understood that. he s like a 1950s hacker cutting a phone line, but this is a much bigger, much more metastasized investigation, and so whatever happens with mueller won t ultimately end this thing in my judgment, no matter what, because the thing is now many multiple things. jeff, do you agree that the public or members of congress would not settle for a brief summary from william barr? well, they might not settle for it, bu